TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
some of these posts are imitation "funky," IMO. that's the deal on the term "funky" = it can be whatever you want it to be at any given moment...unlike "funk" which is its own genre of music. it may not be possible to pose as an authority on 'what is funky', but there are plenty of authorities (musicologists!) who can agree on what is "funk." and although many may disagree on some tunes/renditions: it seems that all agree on the usual suspects. "funk" = a genre. "funky" = an opinion. if i offer to someone that something is "funky" = there's a strong likelihood that it is. if i tell someone a tune is "funk" = it is more than likely: "funk."
here's a group (already posted by a couple of others) and what is surely a "funky" tune....but is it "funk?"![]()
I had the Pleasure of seeing Pleasure live when Glide was a huge hit. Nathaniel Phillips is one of the greatest bassists I have ever seen live.
There’s tons of stuff that’s been posted that I don’t find funky at all. And I’m sure there’s lots of stuff that I find super funky that a lot of other people would disagree with. That’s why it’s good to not present yourself as an authority on something that is purely subjective- no one is right or wrong. If you think something is funky someone else telling you it’s not doesn’t really mean a thing.
