• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Post your 1590a (tiny pedals) pedalboard

Rdub updated his board recently and posted elsewhere:




IMG_0273_zps7daed5e2.jpg

Hey bud

Have you had a chance to compare the mooer ninety orange to the MXR phase 90? The things that are keeping me back from building a nano board are the lack of a decent phaser and a decent octave. Seems like drive, fuzz, compression and boost are pretty well represented but I am not sure about those two.
 
OK, one from outside London. It has my latest pedal, the aptly named sfx Big Beautiful Bass which is rarely switched off.

I have a similar board, just a bit longer for if I need a fifth pedal - either the Mooer Ensemble King chorus, or the MXR Bass Octave Deluxe (my only non 1590a pedal). And a board longer still which takes 6 pedals if I want both. Mooer Graphic B, and Thunderball are occasional substitutes.

View attachment 452096
Awesome!
 
OK, one from outside London. It has my latest pedal, the aptly named sfx Big Beautiful Bass which is rarely switched off.

I have a similar board, just a bit longer for if I need a fifth pedal - either the Mooer Ensemble King chorus, or the MXR Bass Octave Deluxe (my only non 1590a pedal). And a board longer still which takes 6 pedals if I want both. Mooer Graphic B, and Thunderball are occasional substitutes.

View attachment 452096

Nice ... that combo is pretty much my bare minimum (a different comp, but hey). I'd never substitute anything for one of those in a foursome. My next addition to that would be the BMC (have discovered that a minute boost around 140Hz is magic), and then I'd be cooking ... after that come the effects ... BOD and fuzz.
 
Hey bud

Have you had a chance to compare the mooer ninety orange to the MXR phase 90? The things that are keeping me back from building a nano board are the lack of a decent phaser and a decent octave. Seems like drive, fuzz, compression and boost are pretty well represented but I am not sure about those two.
Somebody here did a Mooer Orange 90 demo and it was beautiful. Definitely on my list. That demo is in one of the 1590A threads.
Google is barraging me with Donner ads, and given that modern digital tech is cheap and that our economy is built on third world exploitation these things are looking like they're worth the risk. I don't like my real estate being used up by occasional pedals such as modulations and delays.
 
Hey bud

Have you had a chance to compare the mooer ninety orange to the MXR phase 90? The things that are keeping me back from building a nano board are the lack of a decent phaser and a decent octave. Seems like drive, fuzz, compression and boost are pretty well represented but I am not sure about those two.

The Mooer 90 isn't quite the same as the MXR. Different range of sweep, and different depth. You can get very darn close to the MXR, though, IMHO. Big, fat, gutsy sound. The mode switch at the top changes is from fat to a cleaner sound. I like it, and I don't think there's enough of a tradeoff between size and sound to worry about.
 
Some really cool looking boards. SO much in such a small space.

But seriously (no flaming at all, just curious);
Do any of you find it problematic to have so many footswitches so close together?

with my nano board (just posted by BigBeatNut) and my MIDI pedals, which are the smaller switch sort rather than the organ style I def have to wear very light shoes or even go in socks because i have been known to activate the wrong pedals.