• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Post your favourite tanks

M41 Walker Bulldog.jpg
I'll have to go with this one; the M-41 Walker Bulldog. Not because it was anything special - kind of mediocre, actually. But, I like it because one of my uncles was a tank commander back in the '50s, and he actually let me drive his M-41. On the tank assault course at (IIRC) Fort Chaffee, Arkansas. It was loads of fun, and from then on, I seriously thought about being a tanker when I got old enough. Thanks to a Marine Gunnery Sargent, I joined the Air Force instead. (It's a long story, and has nothing to do with tanks...):whistle:
 
Last edited:
How could we forget this one?

It is because the OP asked for the favorite. For most folks like me who served on a M60 it was advertised as a second tier tank. It never even got its own name for a famous Armored cavalry General, being a minor upgrade over the M48 Patton and worse in every way to its contemporary Soviet tanks. In fact the major upgrade the commander copula with a newer but second tier 50 cal machine gun found itself being blown off by artillery near misses when the Israelis rushed replacement tanks into battle during the Yom Kippur War. About its only "favorite" distinction was that the commander's screen thermal viewer on the A3 model was easier to use while commanding the tank then the M1s thermal sight extension, especially if you were left eye dominant.

I remember watching that news nearly live and remember thinking so that is what the tank can handle. At Fort Knox nor at your unit did the trainers never really let you stress the tank for fear of losing training time that would be needed for an unscheduled busting of tracks. About the only crews who did that for real where those who had an accident with a German's car on the autobahn.
 
It is because the OP asked for the favorite. For most folks like me who served on a M60 it was advertised as a second tier tank. It never even got its own name for a famous Armored cavalry General, being a minor upgrade over the M48 Patton and worse in every way to its contemporary Soviet tanks. In fact the major upgrade the commander copula with a newer but second tier 50 cal machine gun found itself being blown off by artillery near misses when the Israelis rushed replacement tanks into battle during the Yom Kippur War. About its only "favorite" distinction was that the commander's screen thermal viewer on the A3 model was easier to use while commanding the tank then the M1s thermal sight extension, especially if you were left eye dominant.

I remember watching that news nearly live and remember thinking so that is what the tank can handle. At Fort Knox nor at your unit did the trainers never really let you stress the tank for fear of losing training time that would be needed for an unscheduled busting of tracks. About the only crews who did that for real where those who had an accident with a German's car on the autobahn.

I like the M60 :)

Thanks for the insight - interesting.
 
Are you certain our Tiger here in , Ottawa, Canadian war museum is not running now?

The UK Tank Museum state that Tiger 131 is the only running example in the world... couldn't find any info on the Canadian Museum.

Invalid Link Removed

From the above link:
The Tank Museum’s Tiger is unique: it is the only one of the six surviving Tiger I tanks that is capable of running.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murphy
I like the M60 :)

Thanks for the insight - interesting.
I understand it has cleaner lines than a M48. But essentially it is the last example of WWII technology that still soldiers on. It might be upgraded with a removal of the copula and its failed paired M85 machinegun in favor of the old M2, have add on armor and modern electronics, the laser range finders, and solid state ballistic computer and the 105mm gun with modern ammo can take out anything besides a new tank head on. I don't know if the stabilization system has been upgraded. It could keep you near the target while moving but didn't lock on like the forth generation tanks which can fire while the tank was jumping.

Its best tactic was the same as the Sherman tanks meeting Soviets in Korea, get behind a berm of dirt, with its belly open but only showing the top of the turret, and the commander's mini turret copula and use the depression on the main gun and hope the enemy didn't figure out that they could shoot through the dirt at the belly armor. Which couldn't work with laser exercise systems. I do remember trying to sit in a hide position when the hydraulic tanks that control the turret would recharge their pressure giving you away. When fighting a M1/M2 armed unit our only chance was to go quiet, hope we cooled enough to fool their thermal sights, shut down everything and go manual and hope to get in enough hits to break contact and run to our next position, But they were much faster on top of everything else. At least a hit with the MILES system called a hit from a tank equally and treated our 105 as if it would kill a M1 head on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murphy
I understand it has cleaner lines than a M48. But essentially it is the last example of WWII technology that still soldiers on. It might be upgraded with a removal of the copula and its failed paired M85 machinegun in favor of the old M2, have add on armor and modern electronics, the laser range finders, and solid state ballistic computer and the 105mm gun with modern ammo can take out anything besides a new tank head on. I don't know if the stabilization system has been upgraded. It could keep you near the target while moving but didn't lock on like the forth generation tanks which can fire while the tank was jumping.

Its best tactic was the same as the Sherman tanks meeting Soviets in Korea, get behind a berm of dirt, with its belly open but only showing the top of the turret, and the commander's mini turret copula and use the depression on the main gun and hope the enemy didn't figure out that they could shoot through the dirt at the belly armor. Which couldn't work with laser exercise systems. I do remember trying to sit in a hide position when the hydraulic tanks that control the turret would recharge their pressure giving you away. When fighting a M1/M2 armed unit our only chance was to go quiet, hope we cooled enough to fool their thermal sights, shut down everything and go manual and hope to get in enough hits to break contact and run to our next position, But they were much faster on top of everything else. At least a hit with the MILES system called a hit from a tank equally and treated our 105 as if it would kill a M1 head on.

Great stuff, thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: murphy
When i was a little kid I built a plastic model of one of these Swedish Army tanks
Stridsvagn_103_S_Tank_main_battle_tank_Swedish_Army_Sweden_014.jpg


Stridsvagn_103_Revinge_2013-1.jpg


I remember being especially fond of its appearance -- and, years later, perplexed by its functionality -- since it lacked a turret for the main gun.

[edit: apparently it's called the Stridsvagn 103]
 
When i was a little kid I built a plastic model of one of these Swedish Army tanks
Stridsvagn_103_S_Tank_main_battle_tank_Swedish_Army_Sweden_014.jpg


Stridsvagn_103_Revinge_2013-1.jpg


I remember being especially fond of its appearance -- and, years later, perplexed by its functionality -- since it lacked a turret for the main gun.

[edit: apparently it's called the Stridsvagn 103]

Yes - it's kind of weird looking! A really interesting design - its suspension can raise and lower to elevate or depress the gun. It's also got two engines and a second "getaway" driver facing backwards!
 
  • Like
Reactions: murphy and Bob_Ross