Samuel Smith's.....drool![]()
(OK, one hint...in Tadcaster)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Samuel Smith's.....drool![]()
(OK, one hint...in Tadcaster)
![]()
(OK, one hint...in Tadcaster)
As for the kind you started the thread with, I'll take the flying kind every time:
![]()
My father-in-law, RIP, fought his way into Berlin in a T-34. The block to block, floor to floor fighting left it's mark on him, although the Ghetto that he was freed from by the Red Army was no picnic either. He loved the Willys Jeep too.
Given air power and those nasty depleted uranium arms are tanks of any real use except that we make and sell a load of them? On infantry armor is killer but in the integrated battlefield of today I wouldn't want to be in one.
A couple that I like.......
Badass Israeli Centurion
![]()
M-10, upgunned 90mm tank destroyer on a Sherman chassis, the M36 Jackson is similar.
![]()
^ 1st British, 2nd South African, German Panzer. I really like the tanks on wheels
![]()
M1A2 Abrams. Brit armour, American muscle. Only 1 instance of penetration, and the driver still made it home, despite losing a toe or 2. Good man.
Yeah, this one is a tough looking customer: the T-14 Armata
![]()
3 crew, all in the front of the hull - loading in the turret is automated, something the Russians pioneered (I think). Composite armour, I think 120mm gun... must've cost a bit!
Yeah...this is where I was going with this thread...