scotch
It's not rocket science!
- Nov 12, 2006
- 6,944
- 2,081
- 51
- Disclosures
- Please see Profile for Endorsement disclosures
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Lol, but i still see OC-2 and BOD, SYB-5 and BSW... and after all, no stompbox can replace stompbox, even when it`s TU-2 replacing TU-2. It is against TB effects forum moral!But you can see Pitch Factor![]()
How are you using the Phase 90?![]()


Whoa.
Thats alot of stuff.
Bongripper should do a canada tour, and come by me. It makes perfect sense
A fat octave either mixed with clean, or solo'd for its -1oct (and play an octave up the neck) would sound great with that combo you're diggin', as well as a number of other uses; Staying with the current theme of your board, I could see an MXR BOD or Octamizer fitting nicely.
I've been thinking about your advise to add an octave FX... and think I'll start trolling for a used MXR or aggie and then a fuzz. I think this will round out my pedal train nicely.
I much prefer the OC-2 to the octron, admittedly i only had 5 minutes with the octron, but it was too transaprent, sounded exactly like my original signal one octave down, now I can definitley see the appeal in that for some people, but for me the pure synthy glitchy tracking warmth of the oc-2 will never be replaced
Hmm...i dont see bass whammy!
Bleh, some of it might be sold off soon...We'll see...I find it tough to sell a lot of these pedals..
I just made a slight change to my pedal setup ... I added a flanger ...
This is my setup ... I split the signal 4 ways and run the effects in parallel and recombine them into one signal. I mix clean and dirty signals together.