Toasted said:You're too deep into this, man![]()
Sometimes I wonder whether people care that they're using "which" when their clause is restrictive.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Toasted said:You're too deep into this, man![]()
dlloyd said:Sometimes I wonder whether people care that they're using "which" when their clause is restrictive.
![]()
Toasted said:For what it's worth. That bugs me too. It also bugs me when people dont use an apostophe for posession.
dlloyd said:Heh!
Toasted said:Even the perfect can make a typo. [I almost wrote most perfect there.]
dlloyd said:Sometimes I wonder whether people care that they're using "which" when their clause is restrictive.
![]()

If they are just posting to correct spelling mistakes, with nothing to ad to the subject of the thread, you are correct. However, the attitude towards the subject you portray in your first sentence is just laziness. This is part of the root of what people refer to as the "Dumbing down of America". In this case, the way you "practise" makes imperfect.
LajoieT said:so, is it "anal retentive" or "anal-retentive"?
Toasted said:Even the perfect can make a typo. [I almost wrote most perfect there.]
Fuzzbass said:Reminds me: "Unique" is not the same as "original". Something is unique or it isn't... there's no middle ground. Bugs me when people say "very unique", "mostly unique", etc.
daofktr said:hey, adisu:
tayn-li et-ha kass kaffe, v'vak'sha!
i know...poorly transliterated, probably a crappy accent, too.
but if you understand it, i can dig it.
and...
vayomer elohim, 'yihi rock', vayihi rock!
![]()