• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Praise Report: GHS Precision Flats

What's the ball end silk on them babies look like. I tried some EB cobalt flats, they had excessive amounts of silk. So much it interfered with the string sitting in the saddle correctly. Tweaked me off something hard.
 
I tried a set of 45 60 80 105 and they were not quite balanced.
Mr. Moody has said 45 55 75 105 will get you there, not sure which B string though goes with it.

Truly, strings can be "balanced" on paper and not feel that way when you play them.


What's the ball end silk on them babies look like. I tried some EB cobalt flats, they had excessive amounts of silk. So much it interfered with the string sitting in the saddle correctly. Tweaked me off something hard.

We have no silk on the ball ends of any of our strings.
 
Truly, strings can be "balanced" on paper and not feel that way when you play them.
Took me some time to learn this, but that is what I go by now. Does the set feel balanced string-to-string? Volume? Tone? GHS string sets do all that for me and more. Unless someone wants to give me a set to review, my money goes to GHS.
 
Just threw a set of 45-95's again on after a bit of a departure from flats. I've said it before, but this particular set is darn near perfect in the balance/feel dept. I don't like stiff strings and was able to go right from 45-105 Sunbeams to these without even having to touch the truss rod. Set intonation and done. I've probably also said it before, but bears repeating that if anyone is looking to bridge the "feel" gap between TI's and Labella 43-104's, this is the set to do it with. I'd argue it's also way more balanced feeling than either set and obviously cops "vintage" right out the gate.