• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Praise Report: GHS Precision Flats

Also, has anyone tried Brite Flats and could compare to P Flats and/or Pressure Wounds?

I will be test driving a set of the Brite Flats (Light, 45-56-77-98) on my J next month. So, hang in tight till I can post my first impressions.

So, here is my setup as of next week:
  • Precision Flats 3025 (45-60-75-95) on my Precision.
  • Pressurewounds ML7200 (44-58-80-102) + 128B on my Yamaha.
  • Brite Flats L3075 (45-56-77-98) on my Jazz. (First test drive)
 
Thanks Michael. Maybe I'll give the light set a try after all. I just put a new set of Boomers on that bass a few weeks ago, so I'm going to wait until those die before I replace them, but between yours and Jon's comments you've alleviated a lot of my anxiety about trying the lighter set.

Keep in mind, though, that I'm in the process of going lighter with my strings to be kinder and gentler to my 61-yr-old battle-scarred hands. (FOUR trigger release surgeries in the last two years.)

If you're used to the feel of the medium sets of the Boomers (45-105) and the Pressurewounds (44-106), the CM3050 may be more to your liking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NKBassman
I almost never use strings sets lighter than 105, but I recall the 45-105 PF set (M3050) being a little stiff for my current tastes. However, I'm worried that the 45-95 set will be too light (plus it does nothing to lighten the A-D-G strings).

Curious if anyone has tried the "Custom Medium" set? 45-60-80-105?

What I have found is that on a 45 65 85 105 set of flats its always the 85 and particularly the 65 that are too tense and stiff, and having a 60 and 80 instead really helps. The CM3050 is a really comfortable set to play, I highly recommend it.

In an ideal world all makers of flats would do a 45 60 80 105 set.
 
If I ever buy another set it will be 55-105. I'm so impressed with the 0.090 A string of the Fender 9050M set. It's soul stirring. The heavier 0.055 G is so much better in tone & attack than the 0.045.
The difference in the 0.065 D and 0.070 is negligible. Just a tad higher tension. Maybe a bit stiffer, but not much. I think the GHS 0.105 E sounds better than the corresponding Fender, but it is also four years older.
 
If I ever buy another set it will be 55-105. I'm so impressed with the 0.090 A string of the Fender 9050M set. It's soul stirring. The heavier 0.055 G is so much better in tone & attack than the 0.045.
The difference in the 0.065 D and 0.070 is negligible. Just a tad higher tension. Maybe a bit stiffer, but not much. I think the GHS 0.105 E sounds better than the corresponding Fender, but it is also four years older.

lol now you got me all mixed up.
 
I mean you're confusing me as to what I want to buy. I think I'll try the CMs, but now you got me wanting to try the heavies. lol
Only if you know for a fact you like heavier strings. I do. I do not like light wimpy strings especially if they are all flippity-floppity like Thomastik-Infeld Jazz Flats. I understand some folks have medical conditions and must have lighter gauges & lower tension. Some folks are just tension adverse. Not me. I like thicker strings with higher tension. I do not like bridge cables like Rotos or Labellas. Nor do I like their tone or lack thereof.
 
Only if you know for a fact you like heavier strings. I do. I do not like light wimpy strings especially if they are all flippity-floppity like Thomastik-Infeld Jazz Flats. I understand some folks have medical conditions and must have lighter gauges & lower tension. Some folks are just tension adverse. Not me. I like thicker strings with higher tension. I do not like bridge cables like Rotos or Labellas. Nor do I like their tone or lack thereof.

I used to subsribe to "the thicker the better", and I don't have anything preventing me from using thick strings, but I've literally never used an E string lighter than 105, so now I'm curious.

When playing my bass with 45-105 P Flats at a few gigs earlier this year, I definitely got the impression that they were too stiff for my ideal preference. Playable, sure, but I'd like to try at least one step down.