TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Is it just me, but does the space between the A and D strings seem larger than the space between E/A and D/G?
This is a 2013 American Vintage '63 Precision bass. How much does it please your eyes? Do you like/dislike the sunburst, the pickguard?
Fire away!
I tend to be interested in stuff that's a little out of the box. That this is absolute dead center of the box - there's nothing wrong with it per se, It's just not my cup of tea. I don't like the covers - Whenever I see that, I'm struck with the fact it's a bass that I would never want to play - stuff is in the way of where you need to get to. If a bass is unplayable to me, it's very uninteresting - I'm not a collector by any means (I do have a few basses, but they're all players). It also has hardware choices that, yes, they're trying to capture the vibe from an old, bass, but as a musical instrument, I simply don't want the old clunky heavy tuners that Fender designed in the 50's - they're way heavier than they need to be, and they don't work any better; it's time to move on in my opinion. Keep the old stuff on your real 63; that's history, and somewhat interesting in that, back then, those things probably made sense. If you're making bases today to be musical instruments, let's make what works well, and take advantage of what we've learned in the last half century. I'd also never buy it, as, besides being dead center of the box aesthetically, if I remove the covers, you have the silly leftover holes from them.
You must have missed the part about it being a Vintage Reissue. Hence the old style parts. Also, he's asking for comments from Precision People. It's in the title. If that doesn't describe you, why are you commenting?