• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Precision people, how would you rate this one, looks-wise?

Oh, by the way, which one's "Reg"?

upload_2019-5-2_12-23-7.jpeg
 
I tend to be interested in stuff that's a little out of the box. That this is absolute dead center of the box - there's nothing wrong with it per se, It's just not my cup of tea. I don't like the covers - Whenever I see that, I'm struck with the fact it's a bass that I would never want to play - stuff is in the way of where you need to get to. If a bass is unplayable to me, it's very uninteresting - I'm not a collector by any means (I do have a few basses, but they're all players). It also has hardware choices that, yes, they're trying to capture the vibe from an old, bass, but as a musical instrument, I simply don't want the old clunky heavy tuners that Fender designed in the 50's - they're way heavier than they need to be, and they don't work any better; it's time to move on in my opinion. Keep the old stuff on your real 63; that's history, and somewhat interesting in that, back then, those things probably made sense. If you're making bases today to be musical instruments, let's make what works well, and take advantage of what we've learned in the last half century. I'd also never buy it, as, besides being dead center of the box aesthetically, if I remove the covers, you have the silly leftover holes from them.

You must have missed the part about it being a Vintage Reissue. Hence the old style parts. Also, he's asking for comments from Precision People. It's in the title. If that doesn't describe you, why are you commenting?
 
You must have missed the part about it being a Vintage Reissue. Hence the old style parts. Also, he's asking for comments from Precision People. It's in the title. If that doesn't describe you, why are you commenting?

I like Precisions. I have a few basses with that body shape (but they're updated in other ways). I just don't think we have to stay in 1951, or 1957 - we can, if we want, move forward and make it a better and/or more usable musical instrument than it was back then. He asked for my opinion as to its aesthetics. I gave my opinion - I'm a Precision guy, not an "It has to be sunburst with a tort guard, and exactly the same hardware as it was 60 years ago Precision guy". You can, should you choose to do so, have your own opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teh-slb

Latest posts