• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Prism - Dave Holland's New 4tet

Sam Sherry

Inadvertent Microtonalist
Supporting Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,815
2,785
Portland, ME
Dave's new record is a quartet with Eric Harland drumming, Craig Taborn on keys and Kevin Eubanks playing electric guitar. It presents a pretty sharp break from the sound of the beloved DH5, not only in personnel but because Dave only wrote two of the nine songs.

The album opens with Kevin Eubanks' "The Watcher" and it's rockin' pretty heavy. It's a riff-driven mixed-meter tune based on a shred-guitar sound -- it reminds me of the band Tool until Craig Taborn starts soloing on Rhodes. I actually went back to check whether Dave was playing bass guitar: Nope, this is "metal upright." Eubanks' "Color of Iris" has quiet echoes of Mahavishnu. It's a nice tune -- I like it -- but the accompaniment is so riff- and root-bound that it could be essentially any good player on bass. (The solo, of course, sounds like Dave Holland.)

But Kevin Eubanks' compositions are the extreme cases here. The bulks of the record shows a master enjoying some new mixtures of company and checking out some 'new' timbres. I love hearing Craig Taborn play acoustic piano and his writing is a great fit for Dave Holland's aesthetic -- on "Spirals" the first free bit sounds like Circle with guitar instead of horn. Eric Harland's "Breathe" is a gorgeous ballad and Taborn does the piece justice on acoustic piano.

On the one hand, if someone asked me for an introduction to Dave Holland's work as a leader I probably would not point to this record. On the other hand, I will listen to this again, and learn from it, and enjoy it when when I do.
 
I've given this album what I consider to be a fair trial, and I'm just not liking it at all. There are two things that absolutely kill it for me. 1- Kevin Eubanks, his guitar playing, and his guitar tone: 80s cheesey shred metal. 2- The production of the album as a whole. The rhodes is hard left, the guitar is hard right, the drums are panned wide, and the whole thing sounds (to my ears) like each band member was recorded in their own small closet. The music is pretty big, fusion-y, and hard hitting, and to my ears, the mixing engineer just totally missed the aesthetic.

I really love what Holland, Harland, and Taborn bring to the table. I especially like Taborn's unique approach, but Eubanks has this "everything under 500k is cut, thin and screechy" guitar tone happening.

I will instinctively flock to anything that has Dave Holland's name on it, but this isn't something I'll be reaching for anytime soon.
 
I finally got my CD from Amazon and I am similar in not liking that guitar tone - but there is some good stuff in here - I was just listening to the second track and the bass solo from Dave was sublime! I wouldn't want to miss one of his albums and am glad I bought it - need to listen more. ;)
 
Does anybody else think the cover and title are a nod to Billy Cobham's fusion classic : Spectrum?

:eek:

On first look, the cover reminded me of this classic:

Dark_Side_of_the_Moon.png
 
Does anybody else think the cover and title are a nod to Billy Cobham's fusion classic : Spectrum?

Keven Eubanks sounds like a fan of this! :bassist:
It's not the first thing that came to mind at this end, but, yes, maybe...
But it might be a tribute to Katy Perry or Keith Jarrett or matthew ship or charlie haden/mike Brecker...or not :)
The title prism has been given to a few albums and songs in the past. And to other things...
 
I like a lot of Holland's more recent stuff. The big band and quintet. Interesting tunes and great playing. I sampled this one on Amazon and have to agree that Eubank's tone leaves me cold. He's a great player, both Holland and Eubanks, but this one didn't work for me. Great thing about Holland, he'll probably try something different next time.
 
I'm liking the album more - the thing is, it's not one to just sample briefly - a few tracks are dominated by fusion-style distorted guitar, but the majority are more thoughtful and contrasting. The last track on the album has some wonderful acoustic piano and is slow and gentle...:)
 
I am no fan of the guitar tone or playing either, but I find it preferable to slick sax (purposefully using the dumb abbreviation "sax" because it makes more sense in the context) sound of his later quintet recordings. Live the band was great, but all the horn players were just way too slick on the recordings.
It is David Holland - I'll take what he gives us - it isn't going to be the Sam Rivers trio anyway.
 
I am no fan of the guitar tone or playing either, but I find it preferable to slick sax (purposefully using the dumb abbreviation "sax" because it makes more sense in the context) sound of his later quintet recordings. Live the band was great, but all the horn players were just way too slick on the recordings..

So - you're not a fan of Chris Potter? :eyebrow:

It is David Holland - I'll take what he gives us - it isn't going to be the Sam Rivers trio anyway

I tend to agree with that first part - I'm happy just to hear whatever Dave is doing now and I love his bass solos. :)
 
I am no fan of the guitar tone or playing either, but I find it preferable to slick sax (purposefully using the dumb abbreviation "sax" because it makes more sense in the context) sound of his later quintet recordings. Live the band was great, but all the horn players were just way too slick on the recordings.
It is David Holland - I'll take what he gives us - it isn't going to be the Sam Rivers trio anyway.

More silliness...