They either buy the circuits (you know, pay money for them) or buy a license to use them. Unless they're Behringer.
Behringer have found a way to get free chips?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
They either buy the circuits (you know, pay money for them) or buy a license to use them. Unless they're Behringer.
Behringer doesnt make all crap. They made their name on compressors and gates, and those are still pretty decent. Still, I consider them a lot like peavey. They make some good stuff and a lot of mediocre stuff but dont be surprised when it just stops working. It wont be worth getting repaired.
The last part I think is what I most resent about Behringer. They kind of symbolize to me the rush to the bottom that has happened with a lot of electronic gear in teh last few years. It's all gotten so cheap that nobody even tries to get it repaired. So it goes to an e-recycler if you are lucky, more lilkely ends up in a landfill.
Also, behringer stuff just screams "cheap" to me. So I dont have any in my little studio, or my bass rig. I'm 42 years old. Done playing with 2nd rate toys.
Behringer doesnt make all crap. They made their name on compressors and gates, and those are still pretty decent. Still, I consider them a lot like peavey. They make some good stuff and a lot of mediocre stuff but dont be surprised when it just stops working.
They kind of symbolize to me the rush to the bottom that has happened with a lot of electronic gear in teh last few years. It's all gotten so cheap that nobody even tries to get it repaired. So it goes to an e-recycler if you are lucky, more lilkely ends up in a landfill.
i think there's absolutely no comparison between behringer and peavey. there was a time, but that time ended right around 1984-85. and even at their worst, peavey stuff was at least reliable. nowadays i think they're pretty good. not my thing, but they make quality stuff now.
right...all the southern rock bands got peavey established, and that spread to country circles. but what most folks don't know is that they were all secretly rebuilt to marshall and fender specs.Jimmy, like you, I can relate to Peavey and how they were something of an "industry standard" back in the day. You could not go ANYWHERE in Nashville and NOT see Peavey (almost exclusively) being used. This lasted through the late 70s and through most of the 80s.
Of course that was then and this is now.....![]()
i think there's absolutely no comparison between behringer and peavey. there was a time, but that time ended right around 1984-85. and even at their worst, peavey stuff was at least reliable.
Behringer has done a lot of intellectual property ripping and poor implementation, but one area they've advanced beyond that has been that they've actually done some pretty good work with DSP-based rackmount products.
right...all the southern rock bands got peavey established, and that spread to country circles. but what most folks don't know is that they were all secretly rebuilt to marshall and fender specs.

OOOkay, after reading this freaking thread in it's entirety and bassically laughing at some of the comparisons and comments made by some posters of each side of the coin, I have decided to retire to the amps forum here on TB and take an account of each and every thread complaining off gear that has failed. I will make a graph showing the results by brand and post my results in this thread when finished.![]()