TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
me, i like my new basses shiny and... well... new looking.
Players, are willing to shell out EXTRA, for RELICED instruments... Just trying to understand.
And that's the difference between Mojo and sandpaper.I hate the concept of "fake relic" personally. Never understood why one would pay a primo price for bass that is brand new but made to look old? Now if you relic your bass over the years by you playing it and using it that's different.

Because they want to and don't need your approval to do so.why are people paying more for "beat up looking" instruments, that have NEVER been in a "fight?"
^ and squirrels.
I don't think you can buy Mojo.I think the whole relic thing probably started when someone noticed that the the best players in town had well worn basses.
They didn't take the time to consider that those basses were brand new when those great players were starting out.
They didn't think about the stories each mark could tell.
They just assumed the worn basses had a lot of mojo and that must be what made those players so good.
What if it was the many years of playing that did that?
So, now we have people that hope to buy mojo to become or look like better players.
That is why every time someone asks how best to relic a bass, I reply ' buy a new one and play it at least 20 years'.
To each their own of course. 50's P basses are really nice, especially that broken in feel. A roadworn is probably not quite as good, but I can get one for $700. Some people are willing to pay $10,000+ for a real '59. Weird...I have 50 year old basses, that look, well... 50. I get it. They've been around. I just don't want a new bass that POSES as 50. Weird...