There's one in every crowd!!Using both at the same time is even better!
I like that. Gonna try it
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
There's one in every crowd!!Using both at the same time is even better!
Won't that be just overkill??!!!Using both at the same time is even better!

With my LeBass pedal it kind of "SVT's " the tone but you add the mids back in from the front panel. Sounds huge!Won't that be just overkill??!!!
![]()
I'm confused: with "both" do you mean both the preamp an the Quilter at or both imputs: the front and back ones at once?With my LeBass pedal it kind of "SVT's " the tone but you add the mids back in from the front panel. Sounds huge!

I'm confused: with "both" do you mean both the preamp an the Quilter at or both imputs: the front and back ones at once?
![]()
which one is latter?Time to beat a dead horse but I have to say it plainly in a post instead of buried in the middle of posts.
If you are using a preamp in front of a Quilter you owe it to yourself to try both the line in on back and the 1/4" jacks on the front.
I wouldn't be surprised if we took a survey and the vast majority of those who tried both preferred the latter method.
which one is latter?
What I had initially understood is: most questioned users would prefer to run a preamp into the front/jack/instrument imput of the Quilter (latter of both options menioned), rather than into the xlr-balanced-in at the back -which bypasses the Q's preamp- and was mentioned first.
...but, can you actually use both imputs at the same time? (instead of either of them?)
Paying it forward from the Audiokinesis thread - used BB800 @ GC used for $350 [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
With the front input, you gain the benefit of the dual limiters and to me sounds better than any preamp I've tried by itself into the XLR in. Using both inputs, it seems to add a new dimension to the tone (much like parallel compression or OMG mode on the G&L L1000).
Damn, that's the one near me... do I need a second... hmm, maybe i'll go for a drive...Paying it forward from the Audiokinesis thread - used BB800 @ GC used for $350 [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Some of us need pictures and diagrams
So a pre through one of the inputs and a dry signal into the other?
Too much ain't enough!!!Won't that be just overkill??!!!
![]()
Bass ---> input of pedal
Thru/ tuner out -----> passive input of Quilter
Pedal DI out -------> XLR in of Quilter
The Two Notes Le Bass has a switchable cab sim on the Di out that normally has the effect of darkening the tone. When the Le Bass signal is added to the dry signal from the front of the BB800 it results in a pillowy low end with restored highs. I set the BB800 pre to a middley tone (not shown here) to counteract the scooped channel A of the Le Bass.
This method also works with my Basswitch IQ too but the Le Bass's cab sim adds even more... View attachment 2839480
Using more than one pedal in either signal chain can result in phase issues.
Why do you prefer the passive jack imput to the active one. Isn't it more logical to use the active one, using a pedal as an active source?
I'm going straight into the Quilter panel from the Thru output of the Le Bass which is not effected by the preamp. Using the active 1/4" out of the Le Bass results in phase issues (which can be corrected using other pedals in line) but part of the "magic" happens due to the difference of the two signals.
Some experimenting may be required if using different pre's but this method works for me and sits brilliantly in a band mix.
