I agree. Been using Rokit 5s for years now, and never had any problems with bass response. Adding the separate Rokit subwoofer does improve the sound a lot though.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's what I currently do. I just don't see the "point" in having both an amp and the REDDI...You can blend signals for recording but it's really overkill IMO. On stage, I don't get the concept of using an amp with one sound to track your playing and then have the audience listen to the REDDI.
...some people (usually sound guys with a distrust of DI's built into amps, or people concerned with possible amp failure) prefer to take a DI signal before it gets to the amp.
JimmyM said:If you get an outboard XLR pin 1 lifter, that will fix a lot of the problems folks have with grounds buzzing in their amps using the REDDI. For some reason, lifting pin 1 externally works in cases where the ground lift switch doesn't. Just one of those little finicky things about tube amps and transformers, I guess.
So what if you wanted to take the signal from the REDDI XLR to your amp Hi Z and take it to the house too? Could that be done? How would you do it? I'm thinking you could take the XLR into a transformer balanced DI and an XLR Thru to House, come out the 1/4" input to amp. The trick is splitting the signal and getting it to Hi Z without affecting the XLR Low Z to house. Also what if you wanted to take the REDDI XLR straight to a poweramp input? I think that would be easy enough if it went to an XLR input and had a XLR thru on the amp.
Just curious.
If you took the XLR out to the amp, it will most probably have impedance matching issues. I want to do the same thing to color my SS amp, and use the Reddi in the effects loop of the amp.
The thing I've found about splitting the REDDI XLR signal for use in a rig and for FOH is that while it does improve the sound going to your rig, I don't think it's by enough to justify the hit it takes on the tubey quality to the board. YMMV but I and most of us who have tried similar think the best approach just let it be itself and don't try to make it all things to everyone.
Well I can't tell you the mechanics behind it, but I can tell you that Peter Montessi has been hearing complaints about the 1/4" being pass-thru since he added it (yes, the REDDI used to not even have a 1/4" out at all), and if it was that easy, I'm sure he'd do it. Jule Potter has also said there was a reason his Monique preamp has a separate non-transformer-driven 1/4" out as well, and I can't remember what he said, but if it was that easy, he most definitely would have done it.The issue is splitting the signal and keeping it Low Z for the house. It could be done without affecting the signal but would need to add a stepped up transformer DI. The low impedance signal can be split indefinitely to infinity. You would think they would have given this option though I understand it wasn't designed for live performance. To me if it makes you sound "that good" seems like you would want to use it for both especially since there is no EQ going on at this stage of the signal path. I was thinking about getting one of these but I'm on the fence. If I had one first thing I would do is mod it to have a Low Z Thru (easy) that includes a Hi Z out (more difficult but easy too) that is Galvanically Isolated from the Low Z signal.
Also, what works for you and what sounds good on stage does not necessarily transmit into the crowd. Thus you can get the sound YOU want on stage from your amp while the guy at the mixer can control how you mix at the board - note that the REDDI has no eq knobs, just a good sounding preamp that can be tweaked at the mixer for a little more or less of whatever is needed.Because most amps have a DI that doesn't sound nearly as good as the REDDI.
More precisely, though, the REDDI was not ever intended to be used onstage, it was intended for the recording studio only (Peter at A-Designs told me that himself). Because of that, it did not originally have a thru jack at all; they only added it after getting lots of requests from people who were in fact using it onstage.
Well I can't tell you the mechanics behind it, but I can tell you that Peter Montessi has been hearing complaints about the 1/4" being pass-thru since he added it (yes, the REDDI used to not even have a 1/4" out at all), and if it was that easy, I'm sure he'd do it. Jule Potter has also said there was a reason his Monique preamp has a separate non-transformer-driven 1/4" out as well, and I can't remember what he said, but if it was that easy, he most definitely would have done it.
Basically, if you want that sound both in the PA and your rig, you're best off just getting a tube amp and running a speaker-out DI on it.
If that's the case, how come it doesn't sound as good in the house when I split it up as when I leave it alone? And how come Mark said what he said? Peter IS trying to keep it at a certain price point.Jimmy I hate to bust your bubble but it's that easy. Now where is that bubble busting smiley when you need it?
He doesn't do it because he doesn't want to. The XLR out is redistributed from the mixing console to many places such as House, Monitor, Recording etc..... the signal can be gotten into an amp easily without affecting the tone. If it couldn't you couldn't use the thing to start with.![]()
If that's the case, how come it doesn't sound as good in the house when I split it up as when I leave it alone? And how come Mark said what he said? Peter IS trying to keep it at a certain price point.