All I know is I'd just as soon that my Ripper didn't have so much fret wear. But I've been playing only rounds for over 30 years and it happens. Still tolerable though.
Otto
Otto
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So it's not just me! A couple months ago, I put together a bluegrass duo with a guitarist. I wanted to somewhat mimic an upright/ABG sound, so I put flats on my Ibanez EDA905 because it has piezo pickups in the saddles. Anyone familiar with the EDA series knows the body shape is quite nontraditional (I think it resembles a Cheeto), and adding to the weirdness is the fact that a previous owner painted a space scene on the front. I think it looks cool, but it's definitely the most out-there instrument in my collection.
The guitarist said he likes the tone I'm getting and has no problem with me using such an oddball bass, perhaps because his main genre is jazz and he's not familiar with the prejudices of hardcore traditionalist folkies. Because I used to play traditional folk and spent a lot of time around people who denounced electric instruments as inauthentic, I find it a bit unsettling to use the Ibanez in a bluegrass setting even though I'm very happy with the sound and ergonomics. As far as I'm concerned, Ibanez hit a home run with that design; the body is comfortable and its extra long upper horn means no neck dive, even though the bass weighs just under eight pounds. It's shame they discontinued the EDA series after such a short run.
Like you, I started looking at semi-hollow basses, but I asked myself if I really needed to buy a new bass when the Ibanez was doing a perfectly good job. Then I remembered that somewhere in my basement was a Les Paul-shaped Davison body with a center block and two humbucker cavities. A little more hunting turned up an Ibanez EDB605 neck whose body had been destroyed by a previous owner. My basement is truly a treasure trove of guitar and bass parts. I probably should write up an inventory list because I tend to forget what's down there.
I took the body, neck, and a bagful of parts to my local luthier and explained that I wanted him to put a new top on the body, make an ABG-style bridge and saddle, install a piezo pickup under the saddle, and mate the neck to the body. Since he's used to my Frankenstein project requests, he said no problem. He made the new top out of a nice piece of cherry that had been hiding behind a bench in his shop and he's now in the process of cutting a channel for the binding. I think it's going to look pretty nice when done. The luthier warned me that it's not really going to sound acoustic-y (is that a word?), but in my eyes it looks more bluegrass-appropriate than the space Cheeto.
More on-topic, I'm not into relics (I've put a lot of time compulsively patching up dings in every used instrument I've bought; thank goodness nail polish comes in so many colors!), but continue to be amazed that people still feel the need to rant about them every few months. I suspect the thing that irritates the anti-relicers most is their perception that pro-relicers are trying to lead others into believing they're old road warriors with road-worn instrument to match. Since no one really knows if this perception is accurate (and even if it is, so what?), what's the point in fighting about it?
Would this be your space cheeto? I promise I'm not stalking, I googled ibanez EDA905 images and this one from a closed Reverb listing came up near the top of the list.
![]()
MY Jazz Bass has it's share of scars, but it has been in use for 43 years. My P looks new, eventually it will show some age. I'd love to buy an import Dirnt(looks like the old James Gang bass) but I just can't abide artificial wear, maybe they should offer "New" as an option on new basses. ;
A big side bonus for me is far less worry about dings. Note: this is not a binary choice of "trash it or treasure it". I take good care of my instruments, whether they are brand new or my beloved "road warriors", however dings sometimes happen in the real world. With a relic, the first ding is already there (and then some).
A lot of us no longer have 30 or 40 years to wear an instrument properly. I think relic instruments,when done right,look great. And you can take them into any venue and not worry about them getting dinged up.
LOL... I was wondering but decided i didn't really want to know.How does one go about relicing a wife? This is probably one of the strangest(to be polite) things I've ever heard.
Why relic the instruments but not the other stuff where "non-used" is the indicator of success and hard work in your field? Answer: relicing is the hope of mischaracterizing one's experience/awesomeness to the 99%'ers. Yeah, you can say it just looks cool, and it does, but it's really just trying to buy experience that one doesn't have.
The bottom line is that relic is just another visual preference. If you don't like relics, don't buy one. It's childish to go full-snark on those who like something that you don't, regardless of what that something is.
OP reply: Kinda like you going full-snark on me for jotting down my philosophy (because you don't agree with it, valid as it is to me and others, including others who haven't necessarily "liked" my post) after I saw that sweet, old bass and wished that I had lived the bass life that leads to a bass that looks akin to that Stingray/Sabre.
The same childish statements you made about relics could be said about anything. Figured wood boutiques are just one example: "paying extra for flamed spalted bizarrowood is nothing more than misrepresenting yourself. You can say it just looks cool, but it's really trying to inflate your talent. Marketing people have tapped into it and sold it to you". Blah, blah, blah.
Op reply: Childish? It was quite well-reasoned, if lacking a bit in formatting due to cell phone typing, even before the edits I made in order that fewer people will jump to the conclusion that I was categorically bashing reliced instruments. Again, context. Again, it's odd that you say something is lacking reason due to the fact that you disagree with the premise itself. It's okay to disagree with a premise but it's kinda juvenile to say that my statements were childish when, indeed, they were the perfectly valid assertions. Maybe it will help that I have since clarified that I was talking about "buying reliced stuff," this was implied/inspired by above-mentioned wish. Somehow, I doubt that my explanations will ever be enough. Oh well.
.
If you don't want one, don't buy one. If you don't like them, feel free to shut up about it.However, ultimately, it's about both immediate gratification for the musician-buyer and for the subsequent defrauding of the 99%'ers who are likely to think that he is something that he is not.

That's why it's called "show" business. Because watching authenticity business is rather dull for most folks.
Also there's plenty of guys who relic their wives and girlfriends.