Resurrecting a '60's short-scale bass

I started introducing this tagged onto another build thread, but will now continue it under it's own flag. Always ready for a challenge I bought a 60's MIJ short-scale bass in parts. Just received it today and here's what I got so far. Essentially the body is 1.5" thick and of plywood construction. It looks like mahogany ply, a wood many basses then were made of. It's been stripped of it's finish, and the body & neck weigh 6lbs/2oz. The neck (also mahogany) is in good condition and frets are barely worn. It came with parts (some parts missing like pu's/pots etc and various screws) but they aren't worth dealing with so most everything will be replaced. I have many of the parts in my bin and have ordered the few I don't have. I wanted to do this project on the cheap and see what I could do for not much expense.


Thinking about leaving the laminated edge exposed (sanding and staining) and doing the front and back in paint. We'll see once I sand it down. Will also need to plane-down the neck heal - it's way up there! (way too high) Probably original but with all new parts, I'll set it up lower.

A bit on the rough side but I can fix that section - otherwise the rosewood fb has a nice grain pattern

And the neck has a really cool barber-pole wave of grain pattern - I'll sand it to wood and stain it to match.

Won't be touching the hs face because I like this detail - I'll re-do the sides and back only and match them to this hs face.

This is a cryptic pic of what the bass looked like. I plan to recreate the odd shaped pg (because I like it!) and already got the b/w/b pg blank to do so. Pick-ups will be 2 lipstick sets (= 2 humbuckers) and either 250k or 500k pots (V/T) and 2 vintage rocker switches.

 

Sketched the pg shape on the body and transferred it to vellum which will be transferred to the pg blank. Will rout for the rocker switches on the upper right side of the pg - X marks the spot. I also have a thumb-rest that will fit nicely on this bass. (interestingly enough in the Fender 70's position, above the E string)

 

Looks like that doesn't it? It's actually the wood and will look even better once I strip/refinish it.

It took about a nanosecond to hit the BIN button when I saw it!

 

Started work on the neck - used a snap-blade to plane the fb surface which provided me with my fb repair material. (mixed with glue) I polished the frets with those foam (fine) sanding pads cut in small squares.

Removing the old thick lacquer is a job - hs face will be left with it's original coating.

A set of Squier Bronco tuners will replace the mis-matched vintage set with no modifications. They actually look a lot like tuners (boxed back) which were on most MIJ basses then.

 

Let's see some pics of your recently completed project w/a Teisco neck! I may end up using the original bridge plate due to spacing, but the (pot-metal?) saddles are a chunk - talk about "high mass"! I think I can use some saddles that are more low-profile and lighter.

 

I've done a bit of research and the body appears to be a Decca (like the pic black & white pic I posted) - but the hs shape is unlike what appeared on Decca basses, which are more rounded. At first I though it could have been a Kawai (first pic) but then I found this product of Suzuki Violin Mfg. (Ena Gakki factory) who exported several different guitars from 1965-1967. The shape is nearly identical and the "Reinforced Steel Neck" graphic seals the deal!

And yes, I will resurrect it but not 100% as original. I plan to do much altering of it not only to make it a playable, good sounding bass - but to enhance the design elements that I was attracted to while adding my own personal touches.


You'll have to stand back from the pixilated blow-up from my History of Japanese Guitars book, but it has the same "Reinforced Steel Neck" graphics and no hs badge/brand label.

My bass - the barber-pole grain stripes are subtle but in the hs face

 

A magnet is very attracted to them! (so not brass) Drilling them out is an interesting thought... (but a lot more work...)

 

Adding this (which I am savvy) is like trying to put out a fire with gasoline... file under [don't get me started]