• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Returning bass after changing strings?

This might be a silly question but I just wanted to see if anyone has any insight. I bought a new bass from Sweetwater, and I'm about to return it for a replacement.

Only thing is, I cut off the original strings and replaced them. I'm not worried about recuperating the cost of the strings, I can eat that cost, but would there potentially be any problems with returning a bass with different strings from the original?

And then, let's say it's a 5 string bass, and when I replaced the strings, I used high C tuning (EADGC). Does that change the situation? I can't put the original strings back on, but is it ok to return it with the EADGC strings even though it originally came with BEADG? Should I put a set of regular 5 strings with a low B on it before I ship it back? Or am I just worrying about nothing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
Why should you be penalized for putting better strings on a bass?

He put strings on it that won't work for "regular" tuning (they're not "better"). Sweetwater will have to change them to regular strings, and set the thing back up before it can re-sell that bass. They might be nice and let it slide, but there is setup work and a new set of strings they have to pop for.
 
I'd call them and see what they want to do. I can think of no out-of-the-box fives that are sold with an E-C tuning. I'm guessing you didn't replace the nut, so you could always unstring, move the E-G back to where they were and just add a single B.

I'd contact them first. They would be expecting you to return what they sold you as they sold it to you, and that may be how they want it back.
 
Rickenbacker's warranty basically say's you better have the factory strings on the instrument or they could deny warranty!!!!


What's Not Covered
The warranty is void if, upon inspection by RIC factory personnel, the defect is determined to be the result of damage due to misuse, exposure to environmental extremes, modification, or the use of replacement parts, including strings, not in conformity with factory specifications, or due to damage not resulting from a manufacturing defect.
 
What's Not Covered
The warranty is void if, upon inspection by RIC factory personnel, the defect is determined to be the result of damage due to misuse, exposure to environmental extremes, modification, or the use of replacement parts, including strings, not in conformity with factory specifications, or due to damage not resulting from a manufacturing defect.

Precisely what I said , you need to keep the factory strings that came on the bass just in case Rickenbacker decides to make a stink about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stigbeve
I think the OP should have kept the original strings just in case he had to return it, that's just my personally opinion. You never know what could slap you back in the face in case it gives somebody a reason not to cover warranty or taking a instrument back, but again people need to read all manufacture's warranty, in the case with Rickenbacker they are the only company that uses the modification term and referring to the strings not being factory spec.
Every other manufacturer I've never seen anything regarding not having factory spec strings.
One comment above said that Sweetwater might not even noticed and that maybe the case, I still myself would have kept the original strings to put back on the bass but that's just me.
 
Call them. It would be an accommodation if they accept it with your string change-out, but they might accommodate you. I'm assuming there was no modification or damage to the nut in the course of putting on the EADGC strings.

Two things if it was me:
1. If I bought a 6 string bass and I put new strings on it tuned to BEADG I would probably return it and not say anything.
2. @Gorn is right, you could just return the bass, not say anything, and it would go unnoticed. If I was on the receiving end tho, and was a BEADG player who received a bass that was setup and strung EADGC, I would be having some *** thoughts...
 
What's Not Covered
The warranty is void if, upon inspection by RIC factory personnel, the defect is determined to be the result of damage due to misuse, exposure to environmental extremes, modification, or the use of replacement parts, including strings, not in conformity with factory specifications, or due to damage not resulting from a manufacturing defect.

Precisely what I said , you need to keep the factory strings that came on the bass just in case Rickenbacker decides to make a stink about it.

That is 100% absolutely not the case at all whatsoever. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is your friend here - basically they cannot require the use of their own parts as part of the terms and conditions of the warranty.

They are within their rights to deny a warranty claim is the damage is due to the parts in question, but it would be difficult for them to prove in court or mediation that a simple change of strings, unless grossly out of step with factory spec, was the reason for a defective bass.
 
That is 100% absolutely not the case at all whatsoever. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is your friend here - basically they cannot require the use of their own parts as part of the terms and conditions of the warranty.

They are within their rights to deny a warranty claim is the damage is due to the parts in question, but it would be difficult for them to prove in court or mediation that a simple change of strings, unless grossly out of step with factory spec, was the reason for a defective bass.

This on Rickenbacker's site:

Warranty - Rickenbacker