It's easier and causes less damage than trying to pull the coiled strings through the bridge holes, assuming I am not re-using them.Why cut strings to remove them in the first place?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's easier and causes less damage than trying to pull the coiled strings through the bridge holes, assuming I am not re-using them.Why cut strings to remove them in the first place?
of course, you've learned something here: you won't change anything about the 'new one' until you know that it's a keeper, right?![]()
I see it this way...If I bought a new instrument, or even a discounted return expecting to be strung with factory strings and found it had cheap replacements and had been set up for a non-standard tuning, including a truss rod adjustment, I would be a bit more than perturbed. You may be causing problems for a future bass player. Do unto others...
Why would you cut them off if you were not sure about keeping the bass? Why not just uninstalled them non-destructively?
This is after the fact, it is better to un-tune strings to remove opposed to cutting them off. Less shock to the neck.
Buy a new set. Why nickel and dime this. You modified the bass from it's intended use that is providing a low B to the ~3rd octave G. They are in their right to upcharge you.

Context and point of view are everything: Strings aren't permanent hardware despite what some may believe. On a personal note: Strings are an immediate change on any bass I have bought since the beginning of time because they almost always come in 45s and I play with 40s....Regardless, and in all likelihood, whether they have the original set or not, the company will change the strings out again anyway just out of sanitary reasons: because of unknown variables of the previous owner's hygiene status or if the person has practices like self rectal exams before playing the bass, but mainly so that the next potential customer has a re-zeroed set of whatever strings the factory originally ships with itWow.... Given how often people tend to complain about problems when the bass they purchased (from GC, SW, or a seller on eBay or Reverb) is delivered with something they don't like and would not expect — a deficient setup, cheap or otherwise unsatisfying strings, etc. — I find it surprising to see numerous TBers blithely telling the OP to just go ahead and send back the problematic bass with different strings and changes because the seller "probably won't notice or care" and it's not really important anyway, etc, yadda-yadda-yadda....
Frankly, I would now be more hesitant about buying anything being sold by fellow TBers if this kind of attitude is even a little bit common here. Sheesh! I'd hate to think of the kind of moral example these folks might be displaying for their kids: "Don't worry about doing the right thing. As long as you can get away with it, it's okay."![]()
I'd say stringing a BEADG 5 string with EADGC strings is the very definition of "grossly out of step with factory spec."
There’s your answerSo for those asking, I'm returning it for an exact replacement because it has some electronics issues. Turning the tone down is causing the audio output to be distorted. I was originally going to take it to a guitar tech because I really don't like shipping instruments.. such a hassle. But it's so new, and the electronics have a circuit board, so I figured it's best to just get a new one.
One thing I thought of - they don't require me to ship it back until the replacement arrives, so I could take the strings off the new one and put them on the one I'm returning... I may just do that.
Of course, if the new one has issues, I'll be right back in the same boat.