TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Didn't I mention at least one in my post?
as string diameter increases so does tension?
How is that a benefit?( Unless I am quoting the wrong section of the post)![]()
With a reverse headstock, the "fattest" string (larger diameter) is the longest, which increases tension... In other words, it feels "stiffer." It also means the shorter strings are easier to bend (less tension). This is the way it should be (IMO), especially for guitar. I find this to be a benefit of the reverse headstock (as did Jimi Hendrix). The E feels tighter, and less "floppy" (I'm sure the B on a 5 string bass would also feel tighter). YMMV
But isn't the tension the same regardless of where the tuning peg is, as pitch is a result of tension and mass( if I'm not mistaken) and not tuner-placement?
Looks pretty Bada$$ to me.
Invalid Link Removed
If Jason Newstead had a Bass playing son or clone, that is what he / it would look like.Looks pretty Bada$$ to me.
Invalid Link Removed
That's a horse of a different color.