• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

reverse headstocks

to ME:
as far as "cool" goes..no way...different and very noticeable?....yes.

I threw a lefty neck on my righty to kinda copy the white Jackson for a while despite the sticker being upside down.
cpic003x-2.jpg

holding it instead of on the stand is a different prospective, as the live shot pics show in the thread, but still cool to me?...nope, just different.
 
i think it depends on the bass and what application your using it in. If its pointy and metal or hair metal or if its vintage -ish and playing old school stuff. If its put in the right application it looks fine to me. It depends on the person wearing the bass too. That makes a difference in how the bass comes across as far as looks IMHO. How they play, how they look, ect. But we're just talking appearances here.
 
Cool or not, ergonomically, the tuners belong on the bottom where the left hand is. Putting them on top was the biggest mistake Leo ever made.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yodedude2
With a reverse headstock, the "fattest" string (larger diameter) is the longest, which increases tension... In other words, it feels "stiffer." It also means the shorter strings are easier to bend (less tension). This is the way it should be (IMO), especially for guitar. I find this to be a benefit of the reverse headstock (as did Jimi Hendrix). The E feels tighter, and less "floppy" (I'm sure the B on a 5 string bass would also feel tighter). YMMV
Yes!! This!!!
I have a five string Hamer Chaparral that has a reverse headstock and the low B is vicious. It sounds huge! It also was a big advantage for tuned down metal type music. The string did not feel as loose when tuned down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Pelusa