• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rickenbackers

I have avoided this thread for a reason but being a 40 year Rickenbacker player all I will say and this goes for any brand bass, reversible mods are OK by me, but when you start drilling holes, adding pickups that don't fit, putting screws in that don't don't belong etc then you are ruining the bass as far as I'm concerned. Yes I realize it's your bass to irreversibly modify and I don't tell you what to do but many people have opinions and that is mine. I bought a Hipshot bridge for my EB-3 because it wouldn't intonate properly but that does not irreveribly modify the bass at all, I can pull it off again and put the original back on and it's is again stock. Another thing to think about is anytime you irreversibly mod a nice bass you just cut the resale value in half. Incidentally I did mod two Ricks in my lifetime, I epoxied a 4001FL years ago and super glued a 4003FL a few years ago so I'm also guilty of modding a Rick.
 
Last edited:
How about one of these?



If I'm going to be on three wheels, it'll likely be a Piaggio Ape.

IMG_0660.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Scott
I wonder how hard John Hall is laughing when he sees threads with people having debates whether it's acceptable or heresy modifying his product. Like it was mentioned earlier RIC over the decades have modified their own products. You purchased it, modify it as you see fit. Hell, cut the wings of and call it a stick bad if you want. Nothing sacred about a chunk of wood built well with electronics and strings that somehow turns out into the Mona Lisa
 
I have avoided this thread for a reason but being a 40 year Rickenbacker player all I will say and this goes for any brand bass, reversible mods are OK by me, but when you start drilling holes, adding pickups that don't fit, putting screws in that don't don't belong etc then you are ruining the bass as far as I'm concerned. Yes I realize it's your bass to irreversibly modify and I don't tell you what to do but many people have opinions and that is mine. I bought a Hipshot bridge for my EB-3 because it wouldn't intonate properly but that does not irreveribly modify the bass at all, I can pull it off again and put the original back on and it's is again stock. Another thing to think about is anytime you irreversibly mod a nice bass you just cut the resale value in half. Incidentally I did mod two Ricks in my lifetime, I epoxied a 4001FL years ago and super glued a 4003FL a few years ago so I'm also guilty of modding a Rick.
You said everything I should have said initially at the start of this thread there Bob..well done and thanks!
 
While I am totally ok. With people modifying whatever basses, I don't honestly understand why. I mean if there is nothing out there that fits you stock, why bother paying for a bass in the first place. Just build your own and you can have exactly what you want with a fraction of the cost. That's what I have been doing.

Again, I don't think modifying is wrong, but really.
 
I'm a "Ric enthusiast" - but only to a degree. I own 4 4003's and a 620/12. If someone wants to mod their own guitar, in whatever way, no matter what it is, it's THEIR guitar, not a piece of irreplacable art. IMHO. I do like Ric 5's conversions very much and he is doing something that puts a bass out there that Ric can't be arsed to sell themselves. I also don't understand why people get so wound up about them being altered, or not kept stock.

As for copies, Ric protected their designs and police online sales of replicas as we know. Fender and Gibson should have done this a long time ago, so we wouldn't see a million makes of P and Jazz basses floating round. I wish people would come up with their own designs instead of just leeching off the original big names. That said, I do own three Ric replica's (a 5-string and a unique Glitter-finish 4001 style, plus a 1976 John Birch that I just couldn't pass up).

retroviberv5rehl.jpg


rickenbastard.jpg
johnbirchcscdr.jpg
 
This is the green 4004cii5 that I brought up earlier

http://www.3dentourage.com/425/04-4004cii5.htm

upload_2017-9-30_14-34-3.jpeg


upload_2017-9-30_14-34-30.jpeg


Well

After it left my hands it sounded very good. With the replacement pickups and the 4 band Audere preamp it was a very versatile 5 string bass.

Well the current owner didn't like the battery box. So an entire new body wing was made and it was refinished. And it was rewired back to toggle, volume, tone ... pretty much making it a 2 dimensional sound bass with no way to blend the pickups. The one good thing that was done was the neck was repaired and straightened. But damn the repairs on that bass and the original cost and the shipping have to make this bass a $5000 ... ya pretty freaking ludicrous ... this bass was ok at $2000 ... but a $5000 passive 5 string bass with a too wide neck ... This is what I do not understand about Rickenbacker purists ... it is a cult like mentality ... a creepy weird ass religion ...
 
Last edited:
I'm a "Ric enthusiast" - but only to a degree. I own 4 4003's and a 620/12. If someone wants to mod their own guitar, in whatever way, no matter what it is, it's THEIR guitar, not a piece of irreplacable art. IMHO. I do like Ric 5's conversions very much and he is doing something that puts a bass out there that Ric can't be arsed to sell themselves. I also don't understand why people get so wound up about them being altered, or not kept stock.

As for copies, Ric protected their designs and police online sales of replicas as we know. Fender and Gibson should have done this a long time ago, so we wouldn't see a million makes of P and Jazz basses floating round. I wish people would come up with their own designs instead of just leeching off the original big names. That said, I do own three Ric replica's (a 5-string and a unique Glitter-finish 4001 style, plus a 1976 John Birch that I just couldn't pass up).

View attachment 2765843

View attachment 2765844 View attachment 2765845

I really like that 5 string :thumbsup::bassist::hyper:
 
This is the green 4004cii5 that I brought up earlier

http://www.3dentourage.com/425/04-4004cii5.htm

View attachment 2768964

View attachment 2768967

Well

After it left my hands it sounded very good. With the replacement pickups and the 4 band Audere preamp it was a very versatile 5 string bass.

Well the current owner didn't like the battery box. So an entire new body wing was made and it was refinished. And it was rewired back to toggle, volume, tone ... pretty much making it a 2 dimensional sound bass with no way to blend the pickups. The one good thing that was done was the neck was repaired and straightened. But damn the repairs on that bass and the original cost and the shipping have to make this bass a $5000 ... ya pretty freaking ludicrous ... this bass was ok at $2000 ... but a $5000 passive 5 string bass with a too wide neck ... This is what I do not understand about Rickenbacker purists ... it is a cult like mentality ... a creepy weird ass religion ...
Or is it just that the owner of this bass wanted it to be the way HE wanted it.(not someone else’s idea of what it should be...)
So....he had it modded to suit his purpose and preferences. Sound familiar?
 
I agree, that's why I did the VVT on my old Cii, and currently have a VV+selector switch on one of my 4004L basses.

I also really like a 4004 with single coil pickups and a toggle and 2 stacked pots ... then it sounds like a 4003/4001 bass ... If Rickenbacker sold them that way they would sell more 4004 basses ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacBass65