Played on Sunday. Worked great. I am glad to have a fender style bass that plays better than a fender. Having been through many basses this is on top of the heap. Glad to have it in my arsenal
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks Crash,Ok, Roscoe Classic Club Members, get your Club Number here.
1. @CrashClint
2. @Tomservo-Crow
Why does it play better than a Fender?Played on Sunday. Worked great. I am glad to have a fender style bass that plays better than a fender. Having been through many basses this is on top of the heap. Glad to have it in my arsenal
View attachment 1168987
How exactly does the posi-trac rear end on a Plymouth work? It just does. -It just does.Why does it play better than a Fender?
That's my dream bass, so I was curious to hear your opinion. Bassist, Orlando Thompson, allowed me toHow exactly does the posi-trac rear end on a Plymouth work? It just does. -It just does.
I digress to quotes from Joe Dirt. The only Fender I have played that has come close to the neck stability and low action of my Roscoe Classic was a $4,500 Fender Custom Shop and it was flawless and sounded really good. I don't recall what I paid for my Custom Classic 4JJ but it was far less than $4,500.
Why does it play better than a Fender?
You weren't rambling, I appreciate your response! What you said was insightful! I don't get overly excited or gassed up about most basses, but I do get excited about the Roscoe CC P/J.A lot of things can be subjective, personal preference, and opinion based.
"Little" things that add up on the Roscoe are fretwork, neck pocket, neck profile.
I really like that Roscoe uses a recessed hex bolt for the neck attachment. I hated when the screws on the neckplate were stripped and the sharp edges would cut me or a shirt. Not that this was often but I have had it happen. The hex looks less traditional but is definitely more functional in my eyes.
I also wasn't trying to dis Fender with my statement. I have had many American and Mexican fender basses that I really liked. But most of them had a dead spot somewhere and I was not impressed with the B-string on a 5 string precision I had. It was not as present as the other strings. I had to take a hack saw to the intonation screw on the B-string of the 5 string fender precision because I could not lower the action enough with the bass setup for the rest of the strings.
The Roscoe B-string is on par with the rest of the strings in volume and tension, which is partly due to the 35" scale as opposed to fenders 34" scale. But I have had other brand 35" scale basses where the B-String did not impress me either.
I can get my action and setup on the Roscoe how I like it, without really compromising between string height and fret buzz. This is the straightest I have ever gotten a neck without it turning into a buzzing bee.
I am sure there is some great Fender custom shop stuff, but I am happy with the quality and price point of what Roscoe has to offer.
That was long and a little rambling...
I may have to try one somehow. I have been playing my passive G&L JB-2 and I like the "rawness" to the tone, and I use the B string often enough to miss it.
When I pick up my Century 5 I LOVE the neck and the tone - while maybe a tish too modern for my ear these days and for the cover band - is so nice. With a little we tweaking I can take some of the "edge" off it.
So I'm thinking a classic, passive 5 string PJ would be right in my wheelhouse - especially for the cover band. I have never played a passive B string I liked, but maybe Keith has solved that issue.
Thing is, I love the feel of my Century neck and I'm not sure if I'd like the more "traditional" shape of the classic neck.
Thoughts?
I may have to try one somehow. I have been playing my passive G&L JB-2 and I like the "rawness" to the tone, and I use the B string often enough to miss it.
When I pick up my Century 5 I LOVE the neck and the tone - while maybe a tish too modern for my ear these days and for the cover band - is so nice. With a little we tweaking I can take some of the "edge" off it.
So I'm thinking a classic, passive 5 string PJ would be right in my wheelhouse - especially for the cover band. I have never played a passive B string I liked, but maybe Keith has solved that issue.
Thing is, I love the feel of my Century neck and I'm not sure if I'd like the more "traditional" shape of the classic neck.
Thoughts?
View attachment 1170186 Plays like butter! Sounds like a dream! Excellent craftsmanship! The best jazz bass ever!
I had a G&L L2500 that I enjoyed playing in a band. It was a powerful bass!
The fretboard radius was 12" I believe and after a while it felt a little to flat to me.
I am not sure what the radius is on the Century bass, but the 4 and 5 string classics have a 9.5" radius. For me that is kind of the sweet spot. Not to round and not to flat.
As far as neck shape goes, I would say it is something like a flat D. Being narrow enough to move quick on while not being too narrow. It is definitely not a chunky traditional shape.