• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

RWRP on a Rickenbacker 4003 - 411?

RWRP - What's the 411?

  • Do it! It significantly reduces hum; no affect on tone.

    Votes: 9 56.3%
  • Think twice; cuts hum, but hurts tone.

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Doesn't affect the hum; don't bother.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't do it; hum = vintage

    Votes: 5 31.3%

  • Total voters
    16
The magnet on the neck appeared to be the easiest to take off. So, I removed the magnet from the neck pickup, flipped it over, and swapped the pickup leads. Now the bass is humbucking with both pickups on (as it should have been designed from the factory). Otherwise, it seems to sound pretty much the same as it did before the mod to RWRP. If there is any difference in tone, I'm not hearing it, and I'm pretty picky.

There is a small amount of residual hum (not quite 100% cancellation), but it is much better than before. Previously, I completely shielded the inside of the bass with copper foil, but that did not remove the hum inherent to single coil pickups. Given that I play with both pickups most of the time, this should make the bass much better for gigging and recording.

Note, the magnetic material on the neck pickup is semi-soft and comes off with a blade. However, it is also somewhat brittle. Even though I was careful, I had to file a small notch down the middle to allow the pickup lead to come through and it ended up cracking during installation. Still works fine though....

The bridge pickup is a heck of a lot easier to mod. There is a weak adhesive holding the treble pickup together; the adhesive on the neck pickup is a lot stronger.

As mentioned above, on my 1982 4001, the magnet on the bridge pickup is much more firmly attached than the one on the neck. I could wiggle the neck magnet a little, while the big magnet on the bridge pickup would not budge. On the other hand, those with a more recent 4003 just need to undo a couple of screws to flip the magnet around. If I had a 4003, switching to RWRP would be a no-brainer.
 
You're welcome, billoetjen!

From what I've read, the bridge magnet on the 4003s can be easily flipped over after removing two screws on the underside of the pickup. Just swap the leads and you've got golden humbucking bliss! It was a little more tricky on my 4001 because I had to remove the magnet from the neck, which was glued on; hopefully it will stay attached now that it has been re-glued "upside down". Frankly, I don't understand why Ric hasn't been doing this at the factory, as Fender's been making Jazz basses this way since the 60s.
 
I thought I already mentioned it but maybe I didn't, John Hall has reservations about the RWRP mod like some others here seem to. That's why.

I totally respect that--I'm not some kind of unilateral progress Nazi who thinks all basses should move in the same direction. Plus, this mod is easy enough to do that it really doesn't impact people who want an RWRP Ric, whether they are made that way at the factory or not.

Did anyone listen to my clip? It substantiates what 12bass is saying about hum removal. It's not complete, it's partial--but substantial.
 
my rics are pretty darn quiet stock, so i see no reason to change a thing. (i didn't vote because none of the choices in the poll seemed to fit.).

My Rics have always been "pretty darn quiet" too. But I'd like to point out that this mod is really for those who experience hum even just 1% of the time. It only takes one instance in a bar with too many neon signs for you to suddenly change your opinion about this. The rest of the time, play just one pickup or with the cap-in and the sound is unchanged anyways. But occasionally, you run into some nasty hum, and that's the logic behind this.
 
Recorded a clip on my 1982 Rickenbacker 4001 after changing the neck pickup to RWRP by flipping the magnet over and swapping the leads around. The bass also has an original BadAss bridge and has been internally shielded with copper foil. Strings have been on for quite a while. I recorded a few feet away from a pair of Trinitron monitors using an Ampeg SVP-PRO into an Echo Gina24.

http://members.shaw.ca/kevinmacza/Ric_4001_RWRP_sample.mp3

The first part of the clip starts with the bridge, then switches to neck, then to both pickups. The short riffage at the very end starts with bridge, then both, then neck, to hear the change in hum. The bridge volume is down just slightly, where I prefer it, and where it seems to cancel best. Sounds pretty much the same as it did before IMO.
 
Here's one of my Rics with a jazz pickup at the bridge.

b%20168.jpg


b%20170.jpg
 
Maybe I'm being a little too nervous, but I want to make sure that I get the details right. I started the RWRP mod tonight but stopped to get more info.
As everyone has stated about the new 4003's the magnet on the bridge pickup comes off so easily it's as if Ric is facilitating the mod for you. Anyway, I got the bobbin removed from the magnet but I stopped when I couldn't decide the best way to unconnect and reconnect the reversed wires. Should I just snip them and strip them to solder together, replacing insulation with heat-shrink? Or is there a preferred way. I don't see where the wires are soldered to the bobbin, so that's out.

Thanks people.
PS - I put this same question on the Rickenbacker site forum.
 
How do you like the J bass pup with the poles 'off alignment' with the strings? I talked to one of the pup gurus, and he said he could make a custom J style pup with the dual poles aligned right at the string placement.

8 poles cover 5 strings just as good as 10 poles.

I learned this trick from Rickenbacker. The toaster pickup has 6 poles. Rickenbacker uses the toaster on 4, 5, 6, and 8 string instruments. It works well for all of them.