I would consider it apples to apples since both are amp heads, like comparing Granny Smith to Gala!Not really comparing apples to apples here either.
not referring to topology but instead, tonal sweetness!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I would consider it apples to apples since both are amp heads, like comparing Granny Smith to Gala!Not really comparing apples to apples here either.
Sadly, if you bought one, nobody in the audience would ever hear it, because some soundguy would insist you use a DI box...!
![]()
Yeah. It was a sarcastic post. I know nothing about the amp, but I'm sure that it sounds great, and that the speakers have a significant part to do with that.I know you're teasing with this but the direct out in this amp after the pre stage is great and captures a lot of the tone.
It's a darn versatile amp.
Plug an XLR in the back, and he would quickly change his mind. I did a comparison in the studio do the DI feed from the SA200 vs a REDDI. While not an exact match, They were close enough to consider them "cousins." They both sounded wonderful.Sadly, if you bought one, nobody in the audience would ever hear it, because some soundguy would insist you use a DI box...!
![]()
I had the Sadowsky SA410, but it kept falling over face first with amp on top....wheels were placed too far in or something...made it tippy........Sold it for Bergie HT 115 and 210Plug an XLR in the back, and he would quickly change his mind. I did a comparison in the studio do the DI feed from the SA200 vs a REDDI. While not an exact match, They were close enough to consider them "cousins." They both sounded wonderful.
I too wonder how the weight changed that significantly??? Also I believe the original selling price was $2800. I was lucky enough to also own a Sadowsky SA410. The pairing was amazing to say the least. If I was 20 yrs. younger, I never would have sold it, but the shlep up from the basement was just too much for these old bones.
Here's my original SA200:
![]()
After a run of 100 amplifiers, the SA200 was discontinued due to an unfavorable exchange rate between the dollar and the Euro........The SA200 will sell for $2995.00.
Funny, I never experienced that. Mine seemed quite stable, and that included the 45lb shock rack. As far as the SA410, it was not a rebranded Berg. Jim B made them for Sadowsky, but they differed having very tight cones built especially for tube driven amps. I played a GK500/Fusion as well as a Aguilar TH500 though it, and it didn't sound nearly as good as it did with the SA200. They actually were the inspiration for the HS Series. The boxes and tweets were basically the same, but the drivers were looser and paired much better with SS amps. I still have 2 HS210's, and they sound wonderful with a Streamliner 900. I'll tell you this, if you have the physical wherewithal to deal with the weight, it doesn't get much better than the SA200. Sadowsky still has one in the shop for customers to try basses through. This thing will look as good on stage as it does in a living room. It's a striking piece of gear in person.I had the Sadowsky SA410, but it kept falling over face first with amp on top....wheels were placed too far in or something...made it tippy........Sold it for Bergie HT 115 and 210
That is precisely why it's possible to build this run. When the dollar got upside-down against the Euro, it became uneconomical to produce them. Things have changed.Sadly, the unfavourable exchange rate between the loonie and the dollar just discontinued my interest........ alllllmost.......![]()
Yeah. It was a sarcastic post. I know nothing about the amp, but I'm sure that it sounds great, and that the speakers have a significant part to do with that.
Yes...that unusual growth was still there Friday. That SA200 is a nice looking amp in person.That is precisely why it's possible to build this run. When the dollar got upside-down against the Euro, it became uneconomical to produce them. Things have changed.
From NAMM on Thursday. There's some kind of growth on top of this one.
View attachment 779736
Yes. Tom B. explained back in the day that the Eden was pretty different, though. For reference's sake, here are two long threads I've found on the original run of the amp that I'm in the process of reading:Didn't Koch build the Eden tube head they made back in the early 2000s?