• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SBO 2022 - The Tailgate Trifecta

Work is slammed right now. We’re busy, shorthanded, and running on stubbornness, meanness, grit, and caffeine. Whine, whine, cry, cry, etc. All that being said, I’ve managed to steal an hour or so to keep the ball (kinda) moving down the field although I’ve not been doing well to keep the reports coming.

Anyway, I did a little pickup layout “bassed” off Old Faithfull, the MusicMan USA SUB5. I’m planning on putting the bridge pickup in the MM location with the neck pickup exactly 3 inches forward measured center to center.
Pickup layout.jpg


I knocked together a 12degree cutting jig for the table saw and, after taking a raft of measurements, ran her on through.

cutting jig.jpg


Finishing the cut using the Armstrong method...

handsaw.jpg


Dropped both pieces in another router jig, this one designed to clean up 12degree cuts…

planed.jpg


…and crap. Just… crap.:banghead:

crap1.jpg


Unfortunately for your math-challenged interlocutor, there is no way to stretch this board long enough to fit the planned 34” scale. And no, I will not be building a short scale (more on that in a second)

Additionally, I was a little (a lot) distracted when mounting the neckbeam to the cutting jig in the table saw and did this:
crap2.jpg


Yeah… I cut the neck upside-down.

Fortunately, I’ve got another stick of that same curly maple I can make another neck beam from and the too-short neck can be recut shorter for use on the Bass VI. So it’s not a complete loss anyway (at least that’s what I’m telling myself to keep from weeping uncontrollably, starting a bonfire with the pieces, roasting marshmallows while invoking the forbidden words, and swearing off ever trying this whole bass-building business ever, ever, ever again…)

Just kidding.

Mostly.:dead:
 
The next morning bright and squirrely, I gathered up what was left of my ego and ripped the pieces of a new neck beam before running them through the router planing jig.

newneck.jpg


And glued…

gluedneck.jpg


A few hours were spent in template making before doing some chambering on the ash backwood.

templates.jpg


chambering.jpg


The walnut top was prepped…

glueupprep.jpg


The top cavity was signed and dated...

lastlook.jpg


And the top and bottom (or front and back) were joined.

gluedandscrewed.jpg
 
A couple of notes:

The weird lighting in most of these pictures is due to wildfire smoke. It adds a certain je ne sais quoi to the coloration of everything as well as a lovely campfire aroma. Ambience, that's called.:roflmao:

Secondly and before anyone asks, no, the walnut is not book matched. Honestly, it's not really even slip matched. But it is what I have and that's that!
 
Last edited:
…and crap. Just… crap.:banghead:

View attachment 4771283

Unfortunately for your math-challenged interlocutor, there is no way to stretch this board long enough to fit the planned 34” scale. And no, I will not be building a short scale (more on that in a second)

Additionally, I was a little (a lot) distracted when mounting the neckbeam to the cutting jig in the table saw and did this:
View attachment 4771284

Yeah… I cut the neck upside-down.
...
Uhhh.......just flip the scarf to the other side. Like, instead of gluing it like this -
Screenshot 2022-08-04 105647.jpg


Glue it like this -
Screenshot 2022-08-04 105659.jpg


;)
 
Work is slammed right now. We’re busy, shorthanded, and running on stubbornness, meanness, grit, and caffeine. Whine, whine, cry, cry, etc. All that being said, I’ve managed to steal an hour or so to keep the ball (kinda) moving down the field although I’ve not been doing well to keep the reports coming.

Anyway, I did a little pickup layout “bassed” off Old Faithfull, the MusicMan USA SUB5. I’m planning on putting the bridge pickup in the MM location with the neck pickup exactly 3 inches forward measured center to center.
View attachment 4771278

I knocked together a 12degree cutting jig for the table saw and, after taking a raft of measurements, ran her on through.

View attachment 4771279

Finishing the cut using the Armstrong method...

View attachment 4771280

Dropped both pieces in another router jig, this one designed to clean up 12degree cuts…

View attachment 4771281

…and crap. Just… crap.:banghead:

View attachment 4771283

Unfortunately for your math-challenged interlocutor, there is no way to stretch this board long enough to fit the planned 34” scale. And no, I will not be building a short scale (more on that in a second)

Additionally, I was a little (a lot) distracted when mounting the neckbeam to the cutting jig in the table saw and did this:
View attachment 4771284

Yeah… I cut the neck upside-down.

Fortunately, I’ve got another stick of that same curly maple I can make another neck beam from and the too-short neck can be recut shorter for use on the Bass VI. So it’s not a complete loss anyway (at least that’s what I’m telling myself to keep from weeping uncontrollably, starting a bonfire with the pieces, roasting marshmallows while invoking the forbidden words, and swearing off ever trying this whole bass-building business ever, ever, ever again…)

Just kidding.

Mostly.:dead:
I think that pickup arrangement should sound great! I love a dual P, but keeping the bridge pickup far enough away from the bridge to avoid thinning it out too much is important.
 
@TerribleTim68 , I would have followed your most excellent suggestion if the headstock end of my scarf was a bit (approximately 1 1/2”) longer. Unfortunately, doing so would have left me with the proverbial stubby…

Not good.
 
Agreed, it's not random. :spit: I spend a lot of time trying out different combinations when I don't have a bookmatch available. Much more time than putting together a bookmatch. I'd prefer it be a "composition match" or "design match" or something that has a more positive connotation that implies the time and consideration spent at getting something to look the way we want. :rage:

Phew. On my third coffee this morning and just cleaned up a big coke spill off the leather couch, so I'm a tad frosty. :smug:
 
Agreed, it's not random. :spit: I spend a lot of time trying out different combinations when I don't have a bookmatch available. Much more time than putting together a bookmatch. I'd prefer it be a "composition match" or "design match" or something that has a more positive connotation that implies the time and consideration spent at getting something to look the way we want. :rage:

Phew. On my third coffee this morning and just cleaned up a big coke spill off the leather couch, so I'm a tad frosty. :smug:
I started loading the tranq gun and then saw the smiley at the end. Phew.
That was pushing anger management territory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
Least worst match sounds about right!:thumbsup:

At least it's all one species!

And from across a 200 ft. room under stagelights and through a cloud of smoke it'll look great!



Just kidding... The match actually turned out rather nice despite its randomeness;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2groggy
We just need a more posh sounding term for "random match", so we can slam together any number of leftovers and make it seem like we intended it to look like that. :cool:

Fractal Match: Aligned according to the rules of nature, involving math way more complicated than most humans can understand. Don't question it. You simply aren't smart enough to comprehend the pattern. :rolleyes:
 

Latest posts