TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Dragonlord said:Can you identify these tops for me?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Paddy said:Damn that Howie. I don't know - he comes over for a chat and we start talking fretless. Can you see where this is heading yet? I should never have tried Matthews 7 string either.
You only live once and I'm going for it. I know there are plenty of other really talented luthiers out there but I honestly can't think of anyone I would rather work with than Martin. His work is outstanding, he listens to your thoughts and anyone who can put up with my wittering on for months can't be bad.
OK people - I need some thoughts. Here are the definites.
I'll work out the body shape with Martin when I see him - probably another offset Flam. I'm looking for a very traditional fretless tone and looking for brighter and more figured woods to compliment what I've already got. Any and all opinions welcome on the following
- 5 String Fretless
- Headed
- Schack circuit
- Lined (possibly only on side of neck)
Here we go again...
- Fretboard Wood
- Body Woods
- Pickups
fretless Bob said:well the top one is buckeye burl, and the second could be the same or maybe chestnut, not a clue about the last one though, its insane.
Dave
Oh well, I guess I'll have to settle with buckeye then... life sucksmatthewfoote said:If I remember the third is quite hard to get hold of especially bits with good contrast.

Dragonlord said:Regarding my case, I'm getting extremely nervous and enthusiastic as the day approaches... I have made a really long list of features and I hope most of them can be done with no extreme upcharges - if the cost excedes my financial abilities, my second choice is a friend's used Dingwall Voodoo... it's certainly a win/win situation, but I'd really love to walk the custom path for the first time.
It had been with Martin to sort out a problem with my pickups. After discussing options with Martin I went with a new set of Custom Kent Armstrongs to replace the Barts.Dragonlord said:Can you identify these tops for me?
![]()
7string said:I think Paddy or Matthew are more qualified to answer this, but I really feel that the wait will be worth the result and I'll end up with a bass that is not only unique but perfect for my musical needs and playing situation.
Dragonlord said:Well, what I'd love to have is a recessed back body, like the Streamer's or the Thumb's. I don't know how much that would cost, as it would need a fatter piece of wood, and I don't know if a top and back will be possible... but it would be much more comfortable for me, as because of my belly regular basses feel like a piece of firewood against my body... this might up the cost quite a bit. After that there are some other more minor features, like wooden knobs (no idea how much), side leds (site says "from 210"), figured facing (site says "from 50"), 8.5mm string spacing at the nut (which I don't know if can be done as it will be headless), a height-adjustable ramp... most (or all) of these features I can do without, but still it won't be the same bass that I have in mind (and after all that's why I wanna make a custom, to have all the small stuff I can't find in production models), and if I'm gonna spend more than 2000 GBP for a "basic" configuration and wait for 10 months, while OTOH I can have instantly a great bass with the same specs (more or less) for less money, then it's a tough decision... we'll see.