• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Self Defense

Status
Not open for further replies.
morf said:
They're dissing Gene Simmons when they've gotten nowhere playing the music they play. It pisses me off to see so many bassists so full of themselves. Have some respect for ****'s sake.

Alright. Fair enough that they are insulting someone you look up to. These guys are just pushing your buttons dude. Don't let it get to you so much.

-Mike
 
Tim Cole said:
Actually, Pat is a pretty dang good bass player if you must know. I've recently met some guys from here who I'd put on the absolute same level as any pro you can point out.

Hell, I suck and I can outplay Gene, but most 6 month musicians already pass that mark anyway.

You're all so good you're left to advertize your crappy bands in your signatures. Point proven.
 
MJ5150 said:
Alright. Fair enough that they are insulting someone you look up to. These guys are just pushing your buttons dude. Don't let it get to you so much.

-Mike

True enough. I shouldnt let it get to me, you've got a point there, I guess I have a certain respect for musicians and it hurts to see so many be so full of themselves is all.
 
Hey morph, do yourself a favor and print this thread off, and put it away for 10 years....maybe 5 if your current rate of maturing happens to develop tenfold.

That way, you can kick your own arse. That is unless, your arse runs the other way.
 
morf said:
A grandpa, a rustyvinyl, all the same to me. You're a no good bass player dissing an international star because you coudlnt make it big yourself.
No, he's dissing him because he's doesn't rate his playing. Just because someone sells lots of music that doesn't mean they're any good (see your earlier comment about the Arctic Monkeys). Conversely, not selling loads... or not wanting to... doesn't mean you're bad. You've really been dumb, you could have learned a lot about bass playing from some of the guys on this site that you've now alienated.
 
Tim Cole said:
Hey morph, do yourself a favor and print this thread off, and put it away for 10 years....maybe 5 if your current rate of maturing happens to develop tenfold.

That way, you can kick your own arse. That is unless, your arse runs the other way.

Dont say arse, thats english, you're american, people will slap your wrist!!! As far as maturity goes, I'm not taking lessons from a guy dissing a composer he doesn't come near to.
 
Bassline_Delux said:
I just picked up the tail end of this, but all the Grandpa stuff, wasn't all that respectful really...

Indeed it wasn't, but if you read the rest, you'll see that I'm far from being the most disrespectful person here.
 
bassybill said:
No, he's dissing him because he's doesn't rate his playing. Just because someone sells lots of music that doesn't mean they're any good (see your earlier comment about the Arctic Monkeys). Conversely, not selling loads... or not wanting to... doesn't mean you're bad. You've really been dumb, you could have learned a lot about bass playing from some of the guys on this site that you've now alienated.


Thats exactly my point.

You think someone is good because they are technically good, I think someone is good because they've got feelings put into their music AND are technically good. Another reason why you've not made it.
 
morf said:
Errr, obviously, you dont... If thats exactly your point then you're a pretty self contradicting guy arent you
No contradiction. Your point about the Arctic Monkeys just reinforced mine about talent not being the main commodity on sale in the music business. And, if experience is anything at all to do with knowledge, yes, I know better than you. If you think otherwise, ask yourself this... where has your superior knowledge come from? What source of wisdom are you able to tap that is unobtainable to the rest of us here? Your youth, maybe?
 
morf said:
Dont say arse, thats english, you're american, people will slap your wrist!!! As far as maturity goes, I'm not taking lessons from a guy dissing a composer he doesn't come near to.

Great, now you're giving English lessons too. How do you know my heritage?

BTW, even referring to GS as a "composer" pretty much discredits anything else that comes out of your pointed little head.
 
morf said:
Thats exactly my point.

You think someone is good because they are technically good, I think someone is good because they've got feelings put into their music AND are technically good. Another reason why you've not made it.

root root........root root root root. Yep, that's technically great!

"It's cold gin time again" Wow, that WAS deep!
 
"I think someone is good because they've got feelings put into their music AND are technically good."

/*Talks to self*/ Ok..Ok..Breathe... /*Ends Talks to self*/

I think most people will agree, REGARDLESS of composing/marketing/feeling/genral awesomeness, of gene, he wasn't all that technically awesome, pretty much competent only.
 
bassybill said:
No contradiction. Your point about the Arctic Monkeys just reinforced mine about talent not being the main commodity on sale in the music business. And, if experience is anything at all to do with knowledge, yes, I know better than you. If you think otherwise, ask yourself this... where has your superior knowledge come from? What source of wisdom are you able to tap that is unobtainable to the rest of us here? Your youth, maybe?

I really could care less what you think my views on the music industry are.

Talent is not only technical capabilities but also feeling you have for music, composing the lines that will work with the rest of the music. Arctic Monkeys, while they are not technical because still very young, have that talent, and made it big because of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.