• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Seriously cool "old school" building....

If you search you might find a thread with very good explanation, (all down to the physiscs of it which I don't really understand, the thread was full of numbers and formulas i recall) that shows the difference in string tension when the angle of the string changes.
but as darkhorse said, don't think there is much "real life" difference in this.
I think someone stated the main advantage of 45 angle against 90 is that the string suffers less and should last a bit more... but i might just be making this up. don't take my word for it.

Thank's jmorbita, I'll have a look.
I have this project: to turn a JTB-401 '54 style P into something inspired by Carl Radle's '68 custom Tele: adding a split coil to the stock single coil. I have a Bill Lawrence P46 to add. At the same time I want to play around a bit and turn it into something a bit more unique: reshape headstock; recess the neck into the body more; Hipshot Ultra-lite tuners; new pots and cap; and make the bridge string through (which will reposition to accommodate the neck recession) - and thought the Yamaha angle was a cool idea. Yes, I've read a lot that perhaps there is not difference in a through-body approach... but it will be a good exercise. Stock bass is a pretty dang sweet instrument for $300. Very solid.
 

Latest posts