i think some makers of ERB's should put some of the tuners at the rear of the bass. (maybe 6 on the headstock, and a similar "headstock" at the butt. aside from the head up the ass, it would improve balance by adding weight at the butt and removing it from the headstock. making sure the bridge is compatible is a must, but it wouldnt be too bad.
it may be different from traditional bass looks, but you already have a 747 wing for a fretboard so thats a bit out of the question.
as for the resonance thing, i dont believe it is such a problem with laminate necks. the 4 string i made recently has a tiny headstock with smallish tuners, and there isn't a single deadspot in it. in reality laminate necks are a much better design as they create a more stable neck as well. but then again, who wants a p with a laminated neck?
it may be different from traditional bass looks, but you already have a 747 wing for a fretboard so thats a bit out of the question.
as for the resonance thing, i dont believe it is such a problem with laminate necks. the 4 string i made recently has a tiny headstock with smallish tuners, and there isn't a single deadspot in it. in reality laminate necks are a much better design as they create a more stable neck as well. but then again, who wants a p with a laminated neck?

!"
!