I've never thought about this before.
I know how to set intonation. The physics makes perfect sense.
I understand the idea of creating a break at the witness point, particularly on heavier strings like the E and low B.
However, it seems to me that if I set the intonation and THEN create a bend for the witness point, the string will once again need to be intonated, which will negate the original witness point I created.
If I start with the witness point, moving the saddle to intonate will again negate the witness point.
I can rough in the intonation and get very close, and then create a witness point, but I'm wondering if there's a tried-and-true way of having my cake and eating it too here.
It's just possible that I'm overthinking this, but I like my notes to be in tune.
I know how to set intonation. The physics makes perfect sense.
I understand the idea of creating a break at the witness point, particularly on heavier strings like the E and low B.
However, it seems to me that if I set the intonation and THEN create a bend for the witness point, the string will once again need to be intonated, which will negate the original witness point I created.
If I start with the witness point, moving the saddle to intonate will again negate the witness point.
I can rough in the intonation and get very close, and then create a witness point, but I'm wondering if there's a tried-and-true way of having my cake and eating it too here.
It's just possible that I'm overthinking this, but I like my notes to be in tune.

