• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Settle an argument. (Fender vs. FSO vs. non-FSO)

Pick the answer that accurately describes a Precision bass.

  • It must be a Fender Precision Bass. No substitutes.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • Doesn't have to be a Fender, but it must be a FSO.

    Votes: 87 26.0%
  • Doesn't have to be an FSO, as long as it has one split-coil pickup.

    Votes: 34 10.1%
  • It doesn't have to have only ONE split-coil pickup. It can be a P-J and still qualify.

    Votes: 22 6.6%
  • It can be any body shape, and any number of pickups, as long as ONE of them is a split-coil.

    Votes: 28 8.4%
  • Carrots

    Votes: 101 30.1%

  • Total voters
    335
I sold my Jbass a long time ago, you don't need a P and a J. But a P and a T is just fine
IMG_0762.jpeg
 
OK, so what didja think about it? Any big difference between it and the usual passive PBass?
It's never been a passive P Bass while in my possession. Although I have played stock ones with the Ibanez P4 pickup, and they are as P as any passive Fender.
When I got it in the late 90s, it had the EMG P pickup with V & T controls. Not a typical passive P sound--it has more bandwidth and clarity vs a passive P. I installed the BTS system, still not a typical passive P sound--it could get bigger and brighter, or more mid forward if the controls are cut. Sounded great, very versatile, moreso than a Passive P.
After a few years, since I already had a passive Squier P, a passive Peavey P/J and an active Fender P/J, I had the P thing covered. I then converted this Ibanez into a virtual Peavey T-45, which is P adjacent, like a L1000. Passive, humbucker in the sweet spot, Vol,Tone, Mid Cut (via a Wilde Q filter) and push/pull coil split. It's similar to a Passive P now, but still more versatile and fills a niche in the ol' toolbox. I prefer this over a Passive P.
00-0bRNyLnJL0pZOju37gIGvAJPjGm5zan3rARPapS3bn0Sl1tY8I61GCsZ7LWpD7It
 
It's never been a passive P Bass while in my possession. Although I have played stock ones with the Ibanez P4 pickup, and they are as P as any passive Fender.
When I got it in the late 90s, it had the EMG P pickup with V & T controls. Not a typical passive P sound--it has more bandwidth and clarity vs a passive P. I installed the BTS system, still not a typical passive P sound--it could get bigger and brighter, or more mid forward if the controls are cut. Sounded great, very versatile, moreso than a Passive P.
After a few years, since I already had a passive Squier P, a passive Peavey P/J and an active Fender P/J, I had the P thing covered. I then converted this Ibanez into a virtual Peavey T-45, which is P adjacent, like a L1000. Passive, humbucker in the sweet spot, Vol,Tone, Mid Cut (via a Wilde Q filter) and push/pull coil split. It's similar to a Passive P now, but still more versatile and fills a niche in the ol' toolbox. I prefer this over a Passive P.
00-0bRNyLnJL0pZOju37gIGvAJPjGm5zan3rARPapS3bn0Sl1tY8I61GCsZ7LWpD7It
Thank You!
 
It has been said that every "true" bassist needs both a Jazz bass and a Precision bass.
(Your opinion on this matters not. It is a simple fact of life. Thus sayeth Lord Jaco.)
"People say believe half of what you see, son, and none of what you hear."
- Marvin Gaye

I voted for "Doesn't have to be a Fender, but it has to be an FSO". This option includes the G&L LB-100 (MIA and tribute), Olinto P Bass, Sire P5, and other P style basses that look like an actual P Bass.
 
Last edited:
There are a few makers who make far better FSO's in my view but they are based on the originals but they just do it better.
To charge more money by a having a new but pretty close spin is both respect and an improvement. imv.
 
A Precision Bass is a Fender or Squier.
A P Bass is most anything with a Split Pickup mounted at the correct location that looks like a Precision.
A P Bass is also a 51P/54P type of recreation with the single coil pickup in the correct location.
I think a Peavey Fury and a Yamaha BB are a P Bass even though the body shapes are just sorta kinda P shaped.
I think all the higher end P Bass clones like Lakland, Sadowsky, etc are definitely P Basses and "Nearly Precisions".
 
  • Like
Reactions: dougjwray
Carrots:
- Léo called it a precision cause this was the first (or one of the first) bass with frets; which means easier precision when playing note that on a double bass which was the norm before.
- Did the first precision bass have a split coil ?

So all existing fretted bass are "Precision" :smug:
That's exactly what I was thinking as I was reading the posts in this thread. The "norm" prior to Leo's invention was upright basses with no frets. Leo comes along and slaps a bunch of frets on a bass fretboard and he calls it a "precision" bass because the frets provide an "autotune" function. So that would mean all fretted basses are precision basses. But then, Leo copyrighted the name "precision bass" which, at that point, means only Fenders can technically be a "precision bass" per se. From my own personal viewpoint, any FSO (Fender Shaped Object) can be a "p-bass" (not a "precision bass", but a "p-bass") as long as it resembles the form factor and pickup placement that a Fender precision bass has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Polfuste