Man! I wish the Screaminator was an idea when Max built my preamp. It'd been a cool addition to the the built-in Thumpinator.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
caeman said:The idea started with a TBer that had complained about their fuzz sound coming through the PA sounding like crap. On further analysis, it was deduced that without the bass amp speaker to attenuate out the crap high frequencies the fuzz was generating, the fuzz pedal had been producing those sounds all along. That got me to thinking about my rig, since I play primarily direct to PA and I like to experiment with the occasional fuzz sound blended in, but wasn't liking the results either.
Thus, the Micro Screaminator. Thanks to my mad scientist tendencies, I love the -inator suffix, and it seemed appropriate considering the Thumpinator stops thumps, the Screaminator stops screams.
I don't know how many people may find such a thing useful, but I am liking it.
caeman said:5kHz is the cut-off.
You can request Max to build both into the same pedal. As with anything else, if you will pay for it, he will be build it.
René_Julien;12898607 said:And I ordered an AY-2 Max had in stock. (His last one in stock he said, in case anyone might be interested in that pedal.)
He'll just have to build more, cuz the AY-2 is the bomb, makes my bass sound like 4 very different creatures.
I plan to get a custom multi pedal from Max soon-
mThump, AY-2, Ray & Red Dragon

A 2290-style dynamic delay with an fx loop for wet signal. That would be cool.
René_Julien;12916644 said:Max "cloned" the Yamaha NE-1.
Hmm that's not a million miles away from the functionality of the EWS BMC that sits awkwardly on my board at present. If only it had the option for boost as well as cut.René_Julien;12916372 said:
...the EWS BMC that sits awkwardly on my board at present. ....
So I just tried to re-arrange this:
![]()
Putting the BMC into that gap after the tuner to make space at the end of the chain for another (as yet not purchased) pedal.
No way would it fit.
The clash of jackplugs between the high-input low-output BMC and it's low-input high-output neighbours stopped it happening, but another sfx pedal would have fit fine (okay, clash of power plug with the hustle drive above but that's another story.)
So why can't all these guys do things the same way ? Here's a selection of the tiny pedal makers that are most important to me (yes, I am biased) and where they line up on either side of the divide.
low-input high-output
SFX
TC electronics
Lovepedal (in and out are both higher than the others, might still clash)
MythFX
high-input low-output
EWS
Mooer
Hmmm ... not clear cut but it looks like low-input high-output is in the majority.