The mustang build quality was awesome, it just was not my cup of tea, but neither was the epiphone viola!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I picked a Sterling up yesterday and plucked at it a minute, it felt substantial but not particularly heavy at all. Must've been less than 8 lbs, maybe more like 7...Sorry to be "that guy", but I'm searching for the right one also. No one mentions the weight on these, and that's important to me, and my deteriorating back. What do the SBMM and EBMM Shorties weigh?
What have you found satisfactory for a short-scale 5-string?I say get both, they're small....... Seriously.
I was kinda in the same boat. Little life changes (hand surgery left hand) led me to short/medium scale basses about 4 - 5 years ago. Absolutely love 'em. Occasionally a long one comes off the wall for duty, but not very often. Not only did I switch to short scale (31" and 32") but also moved to 5 string so I have the option of all the 1st position stuff higher up the neck on the B string. Much easier on the left hand. And now with more manufacturers producing shorties, there is better selection of strings. A great time to be a bassist.
I'm a tall person, and I really would like to see some short scale basses out there with standard size bodies on them. I don't know if that would place the bridge in a unusable position or not.
There's a couple of things on my pie in the sky "wishlist."
*I wish Steinberger made a short scale bass in their original L2 configuration.
*I wish the Epiphone Jack Casady bass was a short scale Bass with the same size body but again the bridge position thing nags me.
*I wish I still had my '68 EB3, but it's looong gone.
* I miss that $25 Vox Cougar semi-hollow that Vince McAllister sold me back in 1970
Out of these two, I'd get the EB0. I've never had a Dano LH but they look pretty cool......I'm currently eyeing at a Dano Longhorn '58 reissue, or an Epi EB-0.....
That's it! And hey, I'm open to hearing wisdom on this... Thanks for reading!
The Dano saddle is pretty ok, you get it in position for the E and G strings, and the rest is in the ballpark. Intonation can be less precise on a shorty anyway, so it's not much of an issue.Out of these two, I'd get the EB0. I've never had a Dano LH but they look pretty cool.
I guess I don't understand the single wooden saddle.
What happens if you have intonation issues?
This may not actually be a concern, I just don't understand.
But I do own a modded EB0 and I love the feel of the neck.
Some say it's a one-trick pony but that's not an issue since I have other basses anyway.
Besides, it does that one trick very well.....057912
It’s not an either/or thing for me. I like the short scale and I like a 5-string. The B- string does offer the comfort of the closer-to-the-body positions, and the short scale length offers a different set of comforts altogether. …apples and oranges.Side question here.
If you had to pick one, would you get a five string or a shorty? Consider the obvious reason about playing in an upper position for the scale length issue... Then you've got the ability if you have need of the 5er's low B.
What have you found satisfactory for a short-scale 5-string?
Side question here.
If you had to pick one, would you get a five string or a shorty?
I've done that, and tuned to low D and capo'd the 2nd fret. It's visually weird and takes a little time to get oriented.If you really want a short scale, a 5 string (or a 4 tuned BEAD) with a capo on the 5th fret is a 25.5 inch scale with a low E.