When I first got my King, the soundpost was in there sooo tight it was "making a lump" in both the top and back of the bass where it sat. I used a contour guage to measure this, it showed about 3mm on the top, and maybe 1 or 2 on the back. It looked scarier than that! The treble bridgefoot also appeared to be "sinking into the top" as it was right next to the bulge the soundpost was making.
King Instruments suggested I pull the post and let the db rest for a week or so for the top's and back's shape to go back to form, and then trim and reset the post. So I did! The post was in there so tight, it took many well placed mighty whacks to pop it out!
The top and back came back to form nicely after a week, and I trimmed what I'd guess to be about 3mm off the post, carefully shaping it using an inspection mirror and post resetting tools bought for this purpose.
Now, after about two weeks, the treble foot of the bridge appears to be "sorta sinking back into the top."
Nothing like it was before. The bass foot rests on the bass bar, and that side's contour looks very normal. The treble side gets supported by the soundpost right? So if the soundpost is about "a soundpost width below the bridge", is this normal for the top to sink in a tiny bit at the treble bridgefoot, or is something really evil going on?
Additional question: the notches in the f-holes are used to set where the bridge sits, right? On the bass side, centering the bridge on the notch gets me a string length of 42", where King says it's supposed to be. On the treble side, either the f-hole or the notch is off, and centering the bridge on the notch results in a visibly crooked bridge, and a string length on that side of about 41 1/2"...Seems like the f-hole (or notch) on that side is outta place comparatively?
Thanks for reading my longwinded questions, Alan
King Instruments suggested I pull the post and let the db rest for a week or so for the top's and back's shape to go back to form, and then trim and reset the post. So I did! The post was in there so tight, it took many well placed mighty whacks to pop it out!
The top and back came back to form nicely after a week, and I trimmed what I'd guess to be about 3mm off the post, carefully shaping it using an inspection mirror and post resetting tools bought for this purpose.
Now, after about two weeks, the treble foot of the bridge appears to be "sorta sinking back into the top."
Nothing like it was before. The bass foot rests on the bass bar, and that side's contour looks very normal. The treble side gets supported by the soundpost right? So if the soundpost is about "a soundpost width below the bridge", is this normal for the top to sink in a tiny bit at the treble bridgefoot, or is something really evil going on?
Additional question: the notches in the f-holes are used to set where the bridge sits, right? On the bass side, centering the bridge on the notch gets me a string length of 42", where King says it's supposed to be. On the treble side, either the f-hole or the notch is off, and centering the bridge on the notch results in a visibly crooked bridge, and a string length on that side of about 41 1/2"...Seems like the f-hole (or notch) on that side is outta place comparatively?
Thanks for reading my longwinded questions, Alan