BassHappy
Supporting Member
The issue is that not all basses conform to a standard anything. As far as HM bridges, I like the Schaller 3D because of it's designed-in spacers, which when needed are ideal. But to get to the nitty-gritty, I don't like the words BADASS embossed into it. I frankly wouldn't own a bass with one installed. It's something most peeps wouldn't care about, but I just have never been drawn to low-brow marketing. So when I saw the KA (KickAss which is marginally less distasteful) I tried it (twice) and as I've started - it's a decent design as Hipshot is known for. Fender has upgraded versions of their bent-plate and they are all good - it becomes a visual preference after a while, or at least a "if it's not broke don't fix it" thing.
Jeeeeez JIO
I hope not. The Badass was 1970's technology. Even though the design was duplicated and the technology was solid and copied many times - I would hope we have progressed and learned a few things since then. It's been almost 50 years now.
I find this even more distasteful. I don't want to be a circus "barker" for any company:
Last edited:
Earth to those folks - it's a 'look' that many players like regardless of ones misconceived allusion of "trying to fool anyone" because - it's a look that they like! I know.., this is hard to comprehend, that one could rock a distressed looking bass w/o actually being the actual 'real man' that incurred the distressing. (this player that goes by the name Sting comes to mind...) The more open your mind and eyes are to the world, the more the world offers for you to appreciate.