TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Right, they sound different. SM57s sound like junk, compared to a Beta87a. SM 57s sound like junk, compared to a PR22. The point I was trying to make is if the OP is going to PURCHASE a mic, he shou;d probably purchase a MORE USEFUL mic than a CRAPPY SM57 (sorry, but ALL they've EVER been [even] okay at is micing a guitar amp or a snare drum.). That's all I'm trying to get at. Shure's dynamic microphones have been outdone by a LEAP; not a little.Just so the OP knows...
A Beta 87A and an SM57 are to completely different mics. For starters the Beta 87 and its older brother the SM87 are condenser mics which are as far as the general public is concerned are about as close to a vocal only mic as one can get. And as everybody knows the SM57 is dynamic. They could not sound more different. I don't know about the Heil's - but they are well liked.
Whatever. It's all in the ear of the beholder. 57's work just fine for me for a wide spectrum of applications. YMMV and whatever blows your skirt up. Namecalling does nothing for making your point, BTW.Right, they sound different. SM57s sound like junk, compared to a Beta87a. SM 57s sound like junk, compared to a PR22. The point I was trying to make is if the OP is going to PURCHASE a mic, he shou;d probably purchase a MORE USEFUL mic than a CRAPPY SM57 (sorry, but ALL they've EVER been [even] okay at is micing a guitar amp or a snare drum.). That's all I'm trying to get at. Shure's dynamic microphones have been outdone by a LEAP; not a little.
Look at the response curve of a PR20 compared to a SM57.
Buncha Shure fanbois... I've been using Shure mics as long as most of you for all the same reasons. I used to love my 58. Guess what? I'll never buy another one.
Just sayin'...
1) I didn't call anyone a name. A fanboi is just that. A FAN BOY.Whatever. It's all in the ear of the beholder. 57's work just fine for me for a wide spectrum of applications. YMMV and whatever blows your skirt up. Namecalling does nothing for making your point, BTW.
Here are the response charts for comparison:
Link Removed
Really not that similar.
Right, they sound different. SM57s sound like junk, compared to a Beta87a. SM 57s sound like junk, compared to a PR22. The point I was trying to make is if the OP is going to PURCHASE a mic, he shou;d probably purchase a MORE USEFUL mic than a CRAPPY SM57 (sorry, but ALL they've EVER been [even] okay at is micing a guitar amp or a snare drum.). That's all I'm trying to get at. Shure's dynamic microphones have been outdone by a LEAP; not a little.
Look at the response curve of a PR20 compared to a SM57.
Buncha Shure fanbois... I've been using Shure mics as long as most of you for all the same reasons. I used to love my 58. Guess what? I'll never buy another one.
Just sayin'...
I guess the word hasn't gotten out to all the A-list fanbois who use Shure mics (particularly the SM58) on stage. In a live gig situation, no one is going to hear the difference between a PR20 and and SM58. One of the best hand-helds I've heard is my Shure KSM9. While I use mostly Shure mics (SM57, SM58, Beta 57A, Beta 58A, Beta 87C), I also have quite a few Rode, Audix and AKG mics.
Craig_S said:1) I didn't call anyone a name. A fanboi is just that. A FAN BOY.
1) I didn't call anyone a name. A fanboi is just that. A FAN BOY.
It's your loss.All you did with your condescension is make it highly unlikely that I will ever try your favorite $100 microphone.
end rant.
WOW! Thank you!! That means more than you know!Also, I have seen Craig S perform, and the man plays great bass and has an INCREDIBLE voice, so I have the feeling over the years he's used many a mic at least for vocals meets versatility needs.
Pissing match? okay.Not to be the downer here but maybe we could move the pissing match some where else?