TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Scotch...ocasionally tastes better than paint thinner...not often.
I was nosing around Aldwych (in London) this weekend, when I found a specialist whisky shop.
They had a 50 year old + bottle of whisky from the "Springbank" distillery for sale ... at 15,500 Pounds.
Is this normal and just how good can any food or drink be, that would make anyone (aside from poseurs and those who are trying to avoid taxation) want to drop that kind of money on it?
![]()
Wouldn't you rather have a lifetime supply of fine 18 year olds (whisky, not girls), than that one bottle the really old stuff?
Pointless question, I suppose, but I just wanted to share that observation with you.
![]()
Scotch...ocasionally tastes better than paint thinner...not often.
People don't tend to buy bottles like that to drink. Think of them more as an investment, just as with vintage wines, you can use them as a form of investment as they will always be gaining value.
I also like Laphroaig, but found I like Lagavulin better, because it seems to have all that nice smokey peaty flavor, but also be much smoother at the same time. The Islay stuff is not my favorite overall, but of those, the Lagavulin is my fave, so when I'm in the mood for that, it's definitely the one. I do have a bottle of Laphroaig as well, but don't hit that one as often. It's a bit more aggressive than I like most of the time.My favourites are Talisker, Laphroaig and Ardbeg.
Try Bushmill's MALT sometime. No, not the usual black label... it's marked "Malt" on the label. Jameson's is ok, but Bushmill's Malt is my fave Irish Whiskey (tho I'm no connoisseur of IW).I know it's Irish, but Jamesons will do in a pinch![]()
+1!!! (assuming you mean "NEAT wi' a drop of water" anyway, which I figger you do.edit: all taken wi' a drop of water
Depends. True, it doesn't appreciate in the sense that it doesn't change as much over time in the bottle as wine does, BUT, it does appreciate from rarity and desirability, and there definitely are good investments to be made, and in some ways similar to wine, there definitely are better "vintages" of a given scotch.You can only take that so far though. Scotch doesn't age or improve once its in the bottle. Vintage wine does. Theoretically it shouldn't appreciate much in value as opposed to wine.
HAH! You beat me to the punch. Well, I'll leave my comment anyway.It isnt to do with the quality, as, just with vintage wines, they are seldom consumed. It is all about rarity.
I've just come in from sitting on my front porch drinking Cao Ila Cask Strenght and a bit of Lagavulin '89. Needless to say typing is a little tricky. Cheers everyone.

Yeah, scotch has really gone up.
Back when I worked at Beltramos in the '90s, we were selling Macallan 12yr. for $30 a bottle, Lagavulin 16 was $40, and Highland Park was around $23. What I wouldn't give for the prices of days gone by . . .![]()