TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Or if you have a particular tone you really want, use an emulator, for example, a Line 6 Bass PODif you're recording to any DAW = skip the amp/cab and go direct: get the tone you want with appropriate plugins/effects.
good luck!![]()
Are you using the cab just for recording? If you are there might be stuff you can do to the cab itself. My guess is a 100 hz resonance is part of the svt sound it is designed for. If you add a lot of extra damping inside the cab the resonance might decrease. The low end response will change also, but that’s probably eq-able. If you’re not afraid to take a screwdriver to the cab and void the warranty it might be the cheapest solution.
What mic are you using and how do you have it positioned?
I recently did a recording gig with my Tbird Vintage Pro that had Rotosound RS66s on it. The strings were older, but I wasn’t going for an angry piano tone. Plugging directly into my interface sounded good for the hard rock tones the client wanted.I record to a DAW, but do not use plugins at all. I'm fine with my REDDI tone for flatwound no treble Pbass style, but rounds on TBird needs moving air.
Try Bergantino HDN 1-12I have a PF-50T with 210av cab, and it is not usable for recording bass due to an explosive resonance around 100Hz. I initially assumed it was my (treated) room, so I moved it around, tried another larger room, tried multiple basses, turned the bass knob all the way down, and tried another amp in the same spot. It's the cab (I didn't try another head, but that would surprise me if that were the issue). Anyone else have this problem?
Do any of the other small Ampeg cabs like the Portaflex 112 or 210 do this? I don't have a ton of space available, which doesn't make it easier. I need an even, vintage Ampeg-y tone for miked recording at low volume. Nothing else.
I recently did a recording gig with my Tbird Vintage Pro that had Rotosound RS66s on it. The strings were older, but I wasn’t going for an angry piano tone. Plugging directly into my interface sounded good for the hard rock tones the client wanted.
I have a PF-50T and 210AV cabs, but I haven’t recorded with the PF-50T because it has the 60Hz hum issue. Does yours?
I know you want to talk about cabs, but the PF50T has a pretty extensive EQ including a 5 way mid voice switch...
You say you turned the bass knob down, but if the bass knob isn't getting the 100hz, then you might have luck by boosting the bass and midrange (in the right spot). If the bass is below 100, and you boost it & the mid up above 100, then you create a scoop in the 100 area. Subtraction by addition. Lower your gain to make up for additional volume due to the eq boost.
If it's just a cab thing for you, then you might have luck over in some of the ampeg threads, in the portaflex thread, and the like...
I will also comment that an Ampeg cab might not be necessary for a vintage "ampeg-y" tone.
Good luck.
Studios up until 1980s recorded direct bass and miked cabNot sure, I thought thats what a notch filter was for?
Can't speak for professional studio bass players, but just about every studio I have heard of prefers a P bass direct. YRMV.
I have a PF-50T with 210av cab, and it is not usable for recording bass due to an explosive resonance around 100Hz.