• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

So she's suing... ??!!!

kesslari

Groovin' with Fusion Cuisine
Staff member
Gold Supporting Member
Dec 21, 2007
15,222
45,001
Santa Cruz Mtns, California
Disclosures
Lark in the Morning Instructional Videos; Audix Microphones
Mother puts 2 year old child on balcony railing to take picture after a Lakers' game. Which is... not really smart.
Baby falls and dies, which is, truly, tragic.
So mother is suing the Staple Center for wrongful death and negligence.
Invalid Link Removed
 
Sometimes the human mind can do some weird stuff in trying to rationalize a tragedy. A parent losing their child is probably one of the most traumatic things an adult can ever experience. Especially in this instance as it was due to her very own actions. I'm assuming that she's not really in her right mind over this whole thing.
I can understand that, maybe not agree with her thought process, but understand it. What I do NOT understand is how/why a court would even entertain this. Hopefully it gets thrown the hell out.
 
Interesting KTLA reports it differently. According to KTLA.com the parents were not taking pictures of the kid on the railing but were reviewing pictures on the camera when the kid wandered over tithe railing and fell. They claim the barrier is only 2 foot tall and poses an unsafe condition.

That's just a little different than putting the kid on the railing.

Sometimes these things are much more complex and much less ridiculous than a two paragraph news article would suggest.
 
I doubt a 2 year old is going to be tall enough to just "fall over" the barrier. It must have tried to climb it.

It only became an unsafe condition when the parents started looking at the camera instead of paying attention to the child, particularly given they were so high up.

In that instance, the suing would make a little more sense. Not the liability of it all, but the thought process at the very least
 
Sometimes the human mind can do some weird stuff in trying to rationalize a tragedy. A parent losing their child is probably one of the most traumatic things an adult can ever experience. Especially in this instance as it was due to her very own actions. I'm assuming that she's not really in her right mind over this whole thing.
I can understand that, maybe not agree with her thought process, but understand it. What I do NOT understand is how/why a court would even entertain this. Hopefully it gets thrown the hell out.

+1