Please forgive me if this has already been hashed out on TB.
MIDI adapters (SA168) vs Neuro Hub?
MY SETUP:
All-Source-Audio pedal board has EQ2 —> LA Lady —> Atlas—> Gemini—> Ventris
Hotone Ampero Control (has buttons & external expression pedals, can send most MIDI messages).
The first & last pedals have MIDI ins. All 5 pedals are daisy-linked with TRS patch cables from OUT-2 to IN-2 (data line on ring).
GOALS:
I would like to be able change presets (6 presets, or full 128, either is ok), change enable/bypass states, and send expression CC's to the EQ2 and Ventris. I'd need around 8 "states".
OPTIONS:
1. Just old-school forward-bend, flip switches and make the states manually, no CC.
2. MIDI to EQ2 & Ventris, (otherwise option 1 for LA, Atlas, Gemini).
3. Get combine Neuro Hub to build & save configurations, and use Ampero Control to recall PCs.
4. Get one, two, or three MIDI adapters (SA168) for LA, Atlas, Gemini, and run everything from the Ampero.
QUESTIONS:
With Neuro Hub vs MIDI adapters, are there advantages of one over the other for the above goals? E.g., are expression CC's more responsive via MIDI adapter or Neuro Hub?
Might I be able to at least load configs (presets & enable states) via data-on-ring-in2? I.e., might the new (not-yet-released) Neuro App will be able to send out full states to multiple pedals? Since I only need CC on the pedals with actual MIDI inputs, perhaps there's a half-baked workaround there?