I can't remember the last time I saw a test flight that dramatic, or exiting.
Looking forward to a tower landing.
Looking forward to a tower landing.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Do you have a link to the video of the landing?I can't remember the last time I saw a test flight that dramatic, or exiting.
Looking forward to a tower landing.
Do you have a link to the video of the landing?
I wonder how many more flights before they try landing them on barges?
We've got something the size of a 44-story skyscraper, flying faster than a 30.06 round muzzle velocity!![]()
Highlights (I'm reluctant to say Sizzle Reel)
Right to that, that'll be a big step for sure! Amazing. A 44 story building that flies to orbit then returns with accuracy within inches.They're not aiming for barges - it's home to the launch tower, and a big hug from the chopsticks.
Awesome! Thanks for the link.
That is interesting, thanks!Lest we forget about the 'little helicopter that could' on Mars, Ingenuity, I found this interview with the Ingenuity Mars project manager. Talks about the leading theory as to why it crashed on a sand dune and it's future.:
Lest we forget about the 'little helicopter that could' on Mars, Ingenuity, I found this interview with the Ingenuity Mars project manager. Talks about the leading theory as to why it crashed on a sand dune and it's future.:
Host: And it came in for a hard landing off flight 72. What have you learned about what happened?
Tzanetos: Yeah. A lot. And we’re still learning. The team, actually later on this afternoon, there’ll be some meetings that I’m going to attend, where our GNC [Guidance, Navigation, and Control] team and our mechanical team are still digging through the data to try and better our understanding. We will never know, likely, the full, you know, cause analysis, root cause analysis rather, of what occurred. But here are some of the things that we do know: The area of Mars that Ingenuity was flying over towards the end of her mission — which we’ve now affectionately called the place Valinor Hills for nerdy “Lord of the Rings” reasons — was some of the most featureless terrain that Ingenuity had ever experienced. Because of that, it’s kind of a great victory story for us in that we finally found the edge, right? The whole journey over the last three years is, if you imagine the envelope as a sphere, our flight envelope, we’ve been pushing on in every direction between velocity, how high we can fly above ground level, the automatic landing hazard avoidance. In each vector, we’ve been expanding our envelope, and we now found the edge.
That boundary had to do, we believe the leading theory here is, that it had to do with how featureless the terrain was. That’s important because the way Ingenuity flies is she has a downward looking camera, an altimeter, and a set of inertial sensors like an accelerometer and a gyroscope. Very similar to drones here on Earth. Even if you were to take a drone here on Earth, and you were to put it in a white, pure white room, it wouldn’t be able to visually orient itself and figure out from moment to moment where the features are moving in the field of view. And it uses that information to determine and close the loop of where it actually thinks it is in space.
So going back to Mars here, that terrain near Valinor Hills was very sandy, very fine in terms of the texture of the sand. There weren’t a lot of boulders sticking out. And we saw on the logs in flight 70 and in 71 that the number of features that the baby was able to resolve was dropping and going lower, and she was reporting, “Hey, guys, this is getting very challenging for me to, you know, navigate it.” And there was no other path for us to go. We had to go to the northwest because that’s where the river was headed. So the best thing to do was to keep trying to tweak some parameters if we could, and learn as much as we could and, and we succeeded in that regard. Unfortunately, had the rough landing, we weren’t able to keep flying. But she surprised us still.
And as far as the helicopter, you know, computer system is concerned, it’s healthy as a fiddle. She doesn’t know that the rotor is broken. And she’s going to keep on waking up every single day recording data. We have about 20 years’ worth of storage on board and we’re going to be taking a picture every day for future explorers to you know, get a really great time lapse from.
Anyway, thought it was interesting as an update.
Yeah, it can cause vertigo for pilots when they lose internal spatial orientation. Their internal senses are confused, but they're trained to rely on their instruments at that point.But that said, I've spoken to helicopter pilots who've said being in a whiteout is like being trapped inside a ping-pong ball.
The only thing you can do is find a safe place to land, and wait it out.
Alright, no more sea stories LOL. In best pirates voice, "Arrr, matey, there I was, 40 miles off the coast and not a drop of rum aboard...".
I've spoken to helicopter pilots who've said being in a whiteout is like being trapped inside a ping-pong ball.
The only thing you can do is find a safe place to land, and wait it out.
So I imagine they would need to include some autonomous software, that can make a decision in situations where it is approaching the threshold of insufficient navigational data, to either backtrack, set down, or gain altitude to take in a bigger picture.

I keep seeing headlines that Starliner is "stuck" at the ISS due to helium leaks again. But the articles have no details, just sensationalistic trash. Anyone have the real details? Is there a real problem?