• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SPECTOR® Club - Part 50

Status
Not open for further replies.
2012-05-03_21-26-24_234.jpg


2012-05-03_21-26-08_3.jpg

That bass looks familiar
 
That NS-5 looks so tasty but I gotta have 35" on my 5's, I don;t have the dough for that kinda Spector anyways! :D

I generally agree, except this one has been just fine for me and no significant/noticeable difference in the performance of the B even up against quality stuff like my 55-94 and ex Q5's, MTD 535's, Dingwalls, etc..
If I ever order/get another Euro or NS-5, I'll try to get it in 35" scale.
 
My experiences with 34 scale 5'ers has been hit or miss on the B. I find the 35 scale basses that I have owned (Spector/Lakland/Modulus etc) are pretty consistent with the tightness of the B!

yeah I was actually really surprised with my 55-94. usually the "F style" basses (at least IME) don't lend themselves to downtuning or a B string that really excels compared to the basses aforementioned. it's a real quality piece but i'm about to start gigging my NS-5 again exclusively and move the Lakky. kinda need the $$ :(
 
i had a very nice EBMM SR5 earlier this year and i was actually kinda disappointed by the B to be honest. one of the reasons i moved it.

I played my SR5 regularly for almost a decade before I got my first Euro. I thought the B was fine but then again I always used a 135 nickel XL so that probably helped. I am playing my SR5's much less now though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.