On the 1st Gen CV Precision 70s the binding is painted. It's fine. It's beautiful and takes out less meat (wood)!
Interesting. I have the 70s CV Jazz and my binding is definitely a separate plastic.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
On the 1st Gen CV Precision 70s the binding is painted. It's fine. It's beautiful and takes out less meat (wood)!
How does the neck feel? Is it baseball thick?
A bit slimmer than Pre china 50P.
Will decide to let it go soon, pickup sound ,tuning machine and uneven poly paint on neck.
The tuners are another story. Yuck. Grindy / scratchy and inconsistent, just feel bad to use.
So.. I couldn't resist. Installed the Geezer Butler set, custom wired the controls and replaced the backplate and screws.
Oobly, I'm very happy to read your review, I have the exact same instrument on order, and am looking forward to receiving it (likely at least another 30 days or so.)
Do you think the tuners might become a little better to use with a little silicone lubricant? I'd rather avoid changing them out if I can, I see from yours and another thread that these might be non-standard sizes requiring drilling new holes as you did (which is something I really don't want to do.)
Anyway, grats on the NBD, and thank you for the excellent review!
Were the original pickups not very good?
Regarding the custom wiring, I've considered the future possibility of rewiring the knobs so that the volume is controlled by the sleeve and the tone is controlled by the knob... Is that what you did?
If it can't be avoided, why not get a set of Hipshot Ultralites? If you've never used them before, they're held in place by the threaded ferrule and one, single screw. Just measure the mid-point between the two right-most holes, tighten the ferrule to hold the tuner in place, drill a teensy pilot hole, screw it down…and violá! Great tuners and a few ounces shaved off your bass' total weight!I'd rather avoid changing them out if I can, I see from yours and another thread that these might be non-standard sizes requiring drilling new holes as you did (which is something I really don't want to do.)
The A string tuner on my CV 70s P was a little rough when I got the bass (The other tuners worked fine) I lubed them all when I restrung it and they all work fine now.Oobly, I'm very happy to read your review, I have the exact same instrument on order, and am looking forward to receiving it (likely at least another 30 days or so.)
Do you think the tuners might become a little better to use with a little silicone lubricant? I'd rather avoid changing them out if I can, I see from yours and another thread that these might be non-standard sizes requiring drilling new holes as you did (which is something I really don't want to do.)
Anyway, grats on the NBD, and thank you for the excellent review!
Nothing wrong with the Affinity basses, but the new Classic vibe basses are really great. They just overall feel better in the hands I find. Really dig them!I haven't read all 71 pages of this thread, so I apologise if this has been talked about. But kinda wanting to upgrade my bass and I'm really lusting after that 70s walnut P bass! Ive had a Squier affinity PJ for the couple years. I just needed something cheap to get back into playing and it's not been a bad bass.
My question is, is there a huge difference between the new classic vibe series and the newer affinity line? I would think it's an obvious yes, but I was surprised my PJ was a decent instrument once it had a proper setup. Just wondering if it'd be worth it to splurge on what's essentially a toy for me at this point haha (not playing with a band atm)
Thanks for any comparisons or advice
The obvious differences will probably come down to the pickups and the finish on the neck.My question is, is there a huge difference between the new classic vibe series and the newer affinity line? I would think it's an obvious yes, but I was surprised my PJ was a decent instrument once it had a proper setup. Just wondering if it'd be worth it to splurge on what's essentially a toy for me at this point haha (not playing with a band atm)
Thanks for any comparisons or advice
I haven't read all 71 pages of this thread, so I apologise if this has been talked about. But kinda wanting to upgrade my bass and I'm really lusting after that 70s walnut P bass! Ive had a Squier affinity PJ for the couple years. I just needed something cheap to get back into playing and it's not been a bad bass.
My question is, is there a huge difference between the new classic vibe series and the newer affinity line? I would think it's an obvious yes, but I was surprised my PJ was a decent instrument once it had a proper setup. Just wondering if it'd be worth it to splurge on what's essentially a toy for me at this point haha (not playing with a band atm)
Thanks for any comparisons or advice
Just to add to what has already been said, I believe the body is thinner on the Affinity also, it certainly used to be on the older ones.
I would say the Samick-made Classic Vibes (ISS serial numbers) are a good deal "better" than the Affinity in terms of build quality, fit, finish, wood choice and most of the hardware. Up to you to decide if it's worth the price jump. The Cort-made ones (ICS serial numbers) are not quite as good as the Samicks, particularly in terms of attention-to-detail, fit and finish, etc, but still better in some aspects than the Affinity (wood choice, some of the hardware).
...
The models made by Samick (the ones I consider to be the best) are the 50's P, 70's P (including the walnut you're interested in), Jaguar and Mustang. The 60's P and Jazz models are Cort-made (I initially bought a 60's P, but returned it due to poor build quality and finish).
Just to add to what has already been said, I believe the body is thinner on the Affinity also, it certainly used to be on the older ones.
I would say the Samick-made Classic Vibes (ISS serial numbers) are a good deal "better" than the Affinity in terms of build quality, fit, finish, wood choice and most of the hardware. Up to you to decide if it's worth the price jump. The Cort-made ones (ICS serial numbers) are not quite as good as the Samicks, particularly in terms of attention-to-detail, fit and finish, etc, but still better in some aspects than the Affinity (wood choice, some of the hardware).
The Affinity is a good instrument for the money, but with a few mods you'd be hard pressed to tell a difference between one of the good CV's and the higher end Fenders in a blind test, IMHO. I would put my 70's P up against anything in the Fender catalog (admittedly I replaced the tuners, pickup and electronics, but the materials and quality of build are top notch). Likewise my Jaguar once I've finished tweaking it (again: tuners, pickups and electronics).
The models made by Samick (the ones I consider to be the best) are the 50's P, 70's P (including the walnut you're interested in), Jaguar and Mustang. The 60's P and Jazz models are Cort-made (I initially bought a 60's P, but returned it due to poor build quality and finish).
Just picked up this one used ... was looking for a Peavey Fury, but this popped up on the radar screen first. It replaced my old 68, sold a few years back. I got it for rough and tumble live use in blues juke joints. It’s about on par with any of the 70s P basses I’ve owned over the years I’ve yet to contemplate any changes to it, seems fine as is.
View attachment 3762110