Fender is trapped in a swirling cesspool of their own designs, from which they never seem to be able to escape. Some of why they're trapped is obvious in this thread - they take 2 or 3 of their previous designs, and mash them up a bit, and people think it's radical. Really, 2 designs (from the same company 60 years ago) put together, and it's too much?
My input is "Way to think just barely outside the box."
In case there is any doubt, yes, I'm being sarcastic. I think they should take a shot at something that doesn't look like a Fender from the 60's. GM has had a series of Corvettes over the same time period, where all of them look like Corvettes, all of them are "of their time", all of them are classic looks, and they all look a little different. They recently made the leap to a mid engine model. Yes, there have been times when certain people didn't like the new look, but in the end, all of the models sold just fine. My guess is, if Fender had done likewise, there would be fewer people making "almost Fender, but a little better" guitars and basses - Fender might own more of the high end market.