The greats may only need four strings but they're not the ones saying that. That usually comes from fanboys and hacks.
On top of that, this thread includes a video of Stanley Clarke playing a five.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The greats may only need four strings but they're not the ones saying that. That usually comes from fanboys and hacks.
The greats play the number of strings they want to play. Sometimes it's 4. Sometimes it's more. Sometimes it's 4 plus a variety of gadgets to extend the range beyond EADG.The greats only need 4 strings
I am sure that Sadowsky sounds nice, but I don’t think it will have that special honky Alembic sound that I associate with Stanley Clarke. That’s so ingrained in his playing that it’s hard to imagine him with something new.
It would be so nice to hear him play bass with an instrument that sounds like a bass, rather than one that sounds like an enormous banjo.
Live on stage, he seems to use an octaver a lot to compensate for the tenor tuning (ADGC) and it gets loud through an Ampeg fridge cab. Not the most refined sound, if you ask me. And not at all what he sounds like in the studio either.haha…an enormous banjo! I always like his sound. In fact he is the reason that I GAS for an Alembic, although I think they are way too expensive. If you play like Stanley (fast runs, chords and busy parts) you don’t want all that low end, you need a more soloistic tone.
He did visit last year and I worked on his Spellcaster as well.I wish he would’ve visited Roger for an NYC.
What happened with Stanley’s Spellcaster Bass?
You knew there was gonna be one….The greats only need 4 strings