• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Steinberger Club

Here's a attempt in 2002 to build me a Steinie, desperately the truss rod broke and i had to quit the atelier where i was building it...
Dreaming to have one is quite older but i had not the financial possibility back in the '80s... :bawl:

mygear_2-1.jpg
 
Maybe interesting for those who understand German: there are already two reviews in German guitar/bass magazines about Ned's new bass.

Review in the bassquarterly magazine (09.2013):

bassquarterly_201309.jpg


Review in the Gitarre & Bass magazine (09.2013):

gitarre_und_bass_201309.jpg


The corresponding Invalid Link Removed page.

For those who can't read these magazines: they love and praise the bass. And this is not a sponsored review, supported by paid ads. BTW, the bass tested in the bassquarterly magazine is mine :)

Bernd
 
The G&B Mag i read already... the BQ i gonna get me tomorrow...
How comes they get your bass to test?

Last year I've written a Invalid Link Removed for their "sister" magazine (GrandGTRs), together with Tom, so I knew these guys. And then I've been in contact with Ned and NBE (the manufacturers) trying to get a bass for a review as early as possible. Well… obviously successfully :)

After the review was done, I simply bought the bass.

Bernd
 
Just one quick question: in your opinion, how does the new NS bass sound compared to the old ones made of composite material?

It's a little bit hard for me to make that comparison, as the only full composite bass I own is an L2 fretless (passive EQ)… different by nature. The other basses I own are an XM2 (with passive EQ) and the XQ2T (with active HazLabs EQ). The latter is on the workbench right now and didn't get any "real" playing yet.

My personal impression so far (which is backed up by both reviews): the CR 5 is the "best of both worlds". It delivers any sound from clean and bright funk bass to deepest growling. The additional piezo does not only deliver an "acoustic" flavour, but helps to get a very clean and defined attack. This is especially useful with the low B string. The (still) headless design, the carbon neck core and the phenolic fretboard provide the same goodies as a full carbon bass, which means an absolutely equal response all over the fretboard, no dead spots, the bass remains present within a mix, no matter if you're playing low or high notes. The sustain is fantastic, and I personally (disclaimer: I'm a guitarist) find the wider neck and string spacing easier to play.

Bernd
 
You can try another luthier...

Well Rozeg, i'm not into finishing this one anymore. It was a try and i messed it up a little* and since i have the L2/5 i'm also no longer into a wooden paddle, no way to get such density and tone from it.
And finally luthier's costs would surpass an adequate result and falsify my personal intention too... i'll keep it as a memory and who knows as base of another attempt! ;)

*The truss rod is self-made, i welded a screw (M6 Hex) on a steel rod and cut a thread on its end, while stringing and adjusting it the rod broke then (together with my Sb dream :p).
 
Bernd, is it 19 mm spacing? Surely not??

Did you get a good price on it? * You can pm or email me!!! :) )


It's a little bit hard for me to make that comparison, as the only full composite bass I own is an L2 fretless (passive EQ)… different by nature. The other basses I own are an XM2 (with passive EQ) and the XQ2T (with active HazLabs EQ). The latter is on the workbench right now and didn't get any "real" playing yet.

My personal impression so far (which is backed up by both reviews): the CR 5 is the "best of both worlds". It delivers any sound from clean and bright funk bass to deepest growling. The additional piezo does not only deliver an "acoustic" flavour, but helps to get a very clean and defined attack. This is especially useful with the low B string. The (still) headless design, the carbon neck core and the phenolic fretboard provide the same goodies as a full carbon bass, which means an absolutely equal response all over the fretboard, no dead spots, the bass remains present within a mix, no matter if you're playing low or high notes. The sustain is fantastic, and I personally (disclaimer: I'm a guitarist) find the wider neck and string spacing easier to play.

Bernd
 
There's my answer!! hahahaha!


Do you like it anyway?


Yes to both :)

IMHO the CR 5 is a really up-to-date and worthy successor to the preceding line of Steinberger USA instruments. Keeping the headless benefits, making minor concessions to the "afraid-of-being-headless" crowd, the new bridge (using regular strings with the ease of use of double ball strings) is a fantastic innovation, and tonally (EMG + piezo) it's ultra flexible. Just the "paddle crew" doesn't get a paddle. But the CR 5 is lightweight and very ergonomic. Fits the body like a glove.

Bernd