TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I kinda thought that too, but I don't think I'm in that one.![]()
Yes, but this is the Steinberger club....There is a Headless Club;
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f8/headless-club-580919/
We need both.No numbers yet...so, I'll have number 11!
0001...
0002...
0003...
0004..
0005..
0006
0007
0008
0009
0010
0011...Number 11
The numbers are in teh Steinberger serial style!
Feel free to take one.
Don't think I joined yet...
The physical differences are fairly well documented Aphek, but in terms of the sound and playability, I prefer the older L's. I find the edge of the fingerboard on an XL rather sharp, with a shallower neck profile than the L, which is more U-shaped and softer at the edges.
the sound is beefier out of the Ls and with a low mid peak compared to the smoother XLs.
XLs being a bit lower in output and slightly less middly. This is down to the SS or HB pickups in large part, but also due to the Ls having a milled solid brass bridge and a different headpiece, while XLs usually have cast alloy bridges, sometimes with hardened steel inserts
Very early Ls had more kevlar in the mix as Ned was still experimenting with filler at that point
They don't sound cold at all or sterile as some here ( who have probably never played one) will tell you - either model, but the L is slightly warmer.

Awesome! I only joined the headless club because there wasn't a Steinberger club.
Here's a photo from NAMM when I stalked Ned to sign my bass:
![]()
XM2A, from 1991. Made in Tennesee, Newburgh neck.
I'll get a more recent photo, sans long hair and beard, and featuring the bass shortly.
I hereby claim #0012.