TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This thread needs more pictures!
From the way-back machine, circa 1983-5:
View attachment 3070935
View attachment 3070924
View attachment 3070925
...back when I was skinny!
Imperfections...
What might have been a downfall intrinsic to the core design of L2 was the fact - IME, I don't know whether long-time owners like @Bob_Ross would agree - that its hi-fi nature brings out the imperfections in one's playing style like no bass that I've ever recorded and I've recorded many...there's literally nowhere to hide. Sure, one can "mask" certain aspects, but the positioning in the mix that these basses simply "grab" makes it a *lot* more difficult when compared to most - if not all - other pieces.
My $0.02 only...
That's a great observation and one I found to be true for the L2. preamped Alembics and maple fretboard basses. They are less "forgiving" of imprecise fretting and fingers using more strength than needed. They amplify everything and require a more thoughtful deliberate touch. I saw Sting play his on multiple occasions and knew that I had to try one. Took a lot of work to avoid percussive extraneous sounds but when I did, I was far more expressive, saving the aggressive approach for slap pop, a style that few basses can exceed the beauty of an L2. I'd also note that few players string L2s with flat wounds, but I do and that in and of itself smooths away most extraneous noises.Buying a L2 made me play better
Best thing I ever did for my Left (fretting) hand
That's a great observation and one I found to be true for the L2. preamped Alembics and maple fretboard basses. They are less "forgiving" of imprecise fretting and fingers using more strength than needed. They amplify everything and require a more thoughtful deliberate touch. I saw Sting play his on multiple occasions and knew that I had to try one. Took a lot of work to avoid percussive extraneous sounds but when I did, I was far more expressive, saving the aggressive approach for slap pop, a style that few basses can exceed the beauty of an L2. I'd also note that few players string L2s with flat wounds, but I do and that in and of itself smooths away most extraneous noises.
Only the L2 allows the use of single ended strings of any manufacture. I use Ernie Ball group 4 flats. The nut on the L2s has a set of screws that hold down any strings and you can cut or Dremel cut off the extra length. The XL2 does not have that capability.
Only the L2 allows the use of single ended strings of any manufacture. I use Ernie Ball group 4 flats. The nut on the L2s has a set of screws that hold down any strings and you can cut or Dremel cut off the extra length. The XL2 does not have that capability.
OK, I get it, thought I was looking at the "add-on" gadget Steinberger provided for later models, so that setscrew setup was actually incorporated into the L2 headpiece. They dropped that for the XL-2 (I think?)and the definitely on XP series. The add-on setscrew gadget I had was bought directly from Steinberger, a disappointment at the time, and not Ned's finest effort. I assume they actually made it, since they sold it, but maybe they subbed it out to some machine shop.The original L2s work fine in terms of the string tree and the screws. Can't speak to third party solutions. The reason they originally had them was that there weren't double ball ended strings on the market until the L2 was introduced and at that time, initially, Steinberger was the only string made double ball ended.