• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Sterling (Red Head Stepchild Syndrome)

Ok. I’ll play your little game. How is it inferior?

Because your circular argument: “by definition of the word” doesn’t answer my question. All you’re saying is: Inferior things are inferior because …they're inferior!

So, how are you defining your term “inferior” in this instance.

Not too difficult question I’d say. I’m genuinely curious to hear your answer. :)

i think he meant the imports and not the American made Sterlings...which is where i think the confusion comes in
 
Ernie Ball Music Man (EBMM) = Made in USA by Music Man
Sterling by Music Man (SBMM) = Made in Korea by Praxis under license from Music Man

It doesn’t help that the current Music Man CEO is named Sterling Ball, nor does it help that the EBMM Sterling model of bass is made by Music Man in the USA. It‘s terribly confusing. They should have picked a different name for the SBMM company for sure! I imagine that employees of both companies are tired of explaining the difference over and over again.
 
Ernie Ball Music Man (EBMM) = Made in USA by Music Man
Sterling by Music Man (SBMM) = Made in Korea by Praxis under license from Music Man

It doesn’t help that the current Music Man CEO is named Sterling Ball, nor does it help that the EBMM Sterling model of bass is made by Music Man in the USA. It‘s terribly confusing. They should have picked a different name for the SBMM company for sure!
It's a terrible shame, because the EBMM Sterlings I've owned were two of the finest instruments I've ever played. But the confusion over the name makes it very difficult to have any discussion about them, as this thread amply demonstrates.
 
It's a terrible shame, because the EBMM Sterlings I've owned were two of the finest instruments I've ever played. But the confusion over the name makes it very difficult to have any discussion about them, as this thread amply demonstrates.
Well said.

I certainly like my Ernie-Ball-Music-Man-Sterling-No-It’s-Not-A-Sterling-By-Music-Man-That's-a-Different-Company-Damn-It. Don’t you?

Fender has Squier as a sub-brand. Gibson has Epiphone as a sub-brand. How hard was that?
 
Ok. I’ll play your little game. How is it inferior?

Because your circular argument: “by definition of the word” doesn’t answer my question. All you’re saying is: Inferior things are inferior because …they're inferior!

So, how are you defining your term “inferior” in this instance.

Not too difficult question I’d say. I’m genuinely curious to hear your answer. :)
It’s not a game and I’m not interested in your troll. Learn the definition of the word and answer your own question

my statements in this thread are points of fact. Yours are opinion.
 
It’s not a game and I’m not interested in your troll. Learn the definition of the word and answer your own question
This is pretty rude. He's asking you why you think a line of production instruments that sells for under $1K is comparable to a line of instruments that sells for over $2K. If you don't have an answer to that question, it's safe to assume that perhaps you didn't understand that these product lines are different, which is a misconception held by many people.
 
This is pretty rude. He's asking you why you think a line of production instruments that sells for under $1K is comparable to a line of instruments that sells for over $2K. If you don't have an answer to that question, it's safe to assume that perhaps you didn't understand that these product lines are different, which is a misconception held by many people.

No it’s not rude. It’s me not taking the bait. The answer to his question is in this thread. I could repost it all to make the point again but you could read the posts on your own.

Btw. I didn’t say anything that you just posted.
 
No it’s not rude. It’s me not taking the bait. The answer to his question is in this thread. I could repost it all to make the point again but you could read the posts on your own.

Btw. I didn’t say anything that you just posted.

well, it (Sterling by MusicMan) is in fact, inferior. there is nothing wrong with owning one. but it is inferior.

This tread is about EBMM Sterling. NOT Sterling by Music Man..... You can find out when you read everithing back.

Ernie Ball Music Man (EBMM) = Made in USA by Music Man
Sterling by Music Man (SBMM) = Made in Korea by Praxis under license from Music Man

It doesn’t help that the current Music Man CEO is named Sterling Ball, nor does it help that the EBMM Sterling model of bass is made by Music Man in the USA. It‘s terribly confusing. They should have picked a different name for the SBMM company for sure! I imagine that employees of both companies are tired of explaining the difference over and over again.