• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stolen bass which pops on another website...

... and the original seller claims its not the same.

Hello ! I just wanted to share my adventure of the last few weeks. I bought in June a Rickenbacker 4003W on an auction website (something ending with bay...). The shop had it listed available (which is, I think, mandatory on these websites), while the same model was listed unavailable on their official website. Since these basses are quite rare here in Germany, I bought it, including the extra price to cover the fees of the auction website. The seller accepts the order, and sends me the bass. Which appears never picked-up by DHL. I fill a claim, the seller says the parcel was stolen, and that he will soon receive another batch of basses and I can chose one of them, but no walnut. I accepted to take a black one, which I received, and I am perfectly happy with it, maybe more than if I had received the walnut one.

fast forward to this morning, I see a Rickenbacker 4003W popping on another website. To me, it is the exact same wood grain. Of course, I informed the original seller, who claims the bridges are different and it cannot be that bass.

Rickenbacker switched to bridge v2 around 2022, the cover of the bridge pickup was removed in April 2025, both basses have the no-cover bridge pickup. They can only have the same bridges (from factory of course). And I do not see any difference on the pictures...

Here are both basses. What do you think?

The one I bought...

View attachment 7286375

View attachment 7286376

View attachment 7286377

vs the one currently available ...

View attachment 7286383View attachment 7286378 View attachment 7286379
Clearly not the same bass by a long shot !!!
The OP's first pic if you look closely has a white CE sticker on the pickguard .
In the OP's pic of the presumed "same" bass the sticker is not there .
Case closed !
 
Now he's posting images that are either photoshopped or of other basses, because the right one has details that is obviously not the same (grain on the neck for example).
I would guess AI increased, if this is a thing (??). Because the resolution of his picture is higher than mine, an also higher than the original one.
Here is the best resolution I can get from the second add. Same bass to me...

1753796687561.png

On the other hand, the aggressiveness leads to pure trolling. I will ask moderators to lock the thread... What a pity!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makten
yeah I stole it and I have stolen every single bass I have sold here and reverb, just look at my feedback! oh wait, you have no feedback, so who lacks credibility? LOL
Oooooh, has feedback. Nice. Where did you get the right hand picture you posted?

I would guess AI increased, if this is a thing (??). Because the resolution of his picture is higher than mine, an also higher than the original one.
Here is the best resolution I can get from the second add. Same bass to me...

View attachment 7286486

On the other hand, the aggressiveness leads to pure trolling. I will ask moderators to lock the thread... What a pity!
Could be, which just makes his posts even more strange. Why AI enhance an image to prove something that is not true?

Edit: Why did you post this thread at all if you're not interested in the case?
 
If the original seller received a check from DHL, I don't think they can even do anything as they have been "made right". DHL may be able to try to open a case and get their bass back since they paid the original seller for it, but I believe DHL is just too big to care. If the black on you accepted from the seller was the same price as the Walnut, I'm not sure you have a claim as you received a product for the price you paid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GR7G5TER
He’s a businessman. He got his money from DHL. Time is money, and every minute he spends on this is wasted time for him. It’s not surprising at all that he wants this whole thing to be dropped.

If the original seller received a check from DHL, I don't think they can even do anything as they have been "made right". DHL may be able to try to open a case and get their bass back since they paid the original seller for it, but I believe DHL is just too big to care. If the black on you accepted from the seller was the same price as the Walnut, I'm not sure you have a claim as you received a product for the price you paid.
These are the right answers. The claim was filed and paid out by DHL. The seller got compensated AND sold another bass on top of that. Basically he has two sales. The best case scenario is that he would have to refund DHL and recover the original bass and then try and sell that. Its just not worth the time for anyone involved. Nothing sketchy just basic businessing
 
  • Like
Reactions: KenSmithFan
I would steer clear all around. There are too many negative consequences, unfortunately, from doing the right thing. People don’t care about the truth and honesty these days and I wouldn’t fight this battle. It’s just a bass and a little bit of money. Stay away from all involved and if you have friends nearby, tell them via word of mouth to stay away too. Leave it behind and play the black bass loud!
Correct answer.
 
Friends, we can continue the conversation in this thread as long as all recall rule #1 at TalkBass. These threads move fast at times, and along the way you are going to see a comment you disagree with or maybe you think it is ridiculous. I ask, please, that you take a minute to think about everything you typed on your screen before you click or tap on that 'Post reply' button.

For those for whom it has escaped their memory as to rule #1, here it is....
"Rule #1: Respect your fellow members. All registered users must address fellow members with the utmost respect at all times. If you do not agree with a fellow member, be courteous in your response. Thomas Jefferson said it best: "When I hear another express an opinion which is not mine, I say to myself, he has a right to his opinion, as I to mine".

Because of the limitations of text-based communication, the expression of intent can be tricky. One of the most common triggers of rule violations is the misinterpretation of intent behind a post. Use smilies often, and remember, it never hurts to begin a response with "In my opinion"...

If you do not address everyone on the board with respect, be prepared to lose your membership.

Please remember that threads are not your personal property and others are welcome to post relevant comments in them, including clubs and ads. We do not allow exclusionary posts here, so please do not state that certain other members (for any particular reason) cannot post in your thread."

-Mike
 
I am a beaver who comes from a family who owns a printing business, therefore I know more about wood and digital images than all of you and I can say that definitely:



The OP should go enjoy his new bass and everyone can stop worrying about whatever is going on in this thread.
So, you haven't read the thread? Niiice.